Meatpacking: The Dangerous Reality for Workers

  • Thread starter Thread starter Monique
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the role of meat in diets and the ethical implications of meat consumption. Participants express varying views on whether a diner can function without meat, with some advocating for vegetarianism due to health and ethical concerns about animal suffering. Others argue that meat is a natural part of the human diet and that the focus on animal suffering overlooks the environmental impact of plant agriculture. The conversation also touches on the treatment of animals in the meat industry and the need for humane practices. Ultimately, the debate highlights the complexity of dietary choices and the differing perspectives on meat consumption and its implications.

I eat meat with a meal

  • never

    Votes: 7 11.3%
  • 1-2 per week

    Votes: 2 3.2%
  • 3-4 per week

    Votes: 10 16.1%
  • 5-6 per week

    Votes: 21 33.9%
  • always

    Votes: 22 35.5%

  • Total voters
    62
Monique
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,211
Reaction score
68
How much does meat play a part in your diner?

Do you think a diner can not be served without meat, or that you'd be able to adept a vegetarian diet?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I chose 3-4 per week option. Meat can be found in one form or another in my diet.

I find it so strange that people are so focussed on meat and disregard the suffering of an animal that ends up on their plate.

What do you mean by suffering? Dont the animals suffer when another animal kills them for food? Thats the way of life and I see no reason why a person should give up eating meat(unless its for medical reasons that is).
 
Last edited:
Most days of the week I eat cereals, cheese, and salads. Once or twice a week I have dinner with my daughter and order meat, usually a steak, prime rib, or pot roast.
 
Monique said:
I find it so strange that people . . . disregard the suffering of an animal that ends up on their plate.

Well, I'd hope they would make sure it was dead first. :biggrin:

To be more serious, when I was younger I was around farm life often and I'd say the animals were butchered humanely, and usually with less suffering than when another animal kills them as prey. And until their slaughter, they led a pretty luxurious life.

My first reason for quitting meat back in 1972 was for health. I am soooooo glad I did. But I also was feeling I didn't want to be part of the violence it takes to kill. It seemed to make me less consciously sensitive, as did eating meat. So I'd have to say that my main reasons for not eating it are out of self interest.

If the meat industry didn't treat animals so horrendously, I don't think I'd see a problem with killing animals for food since that is how nature itself is set up. I do eat dairy products, and there is a concern there too about animal cruelty. Self interest is still a priority for me, so I make sure it is organic to avoid the hormones and antibiotics they give dairy cows, and the pesticides in the grains they feed them. But a dairy available here also makes sure the cows have a decent life by letting them graze outside, etc. So I support that dairy because I don't want animals to suffer.


Monique said:
Do you think a diner can not be served without meat, or that you'd be able to adept a vegetarian diet?

Once one learns some basic dietary and gourmet cooking principles, there's nothing to it. I have a lot of meat-eating friends who claim to love my cooking. I've heard them say many times they don't even notice the lack of meat. Of course when I am at their house and they've got the barbie going, it's quite the spectacle to me. I usually tolerate the smells okay but I have a hard time watching them chow down on a carcass and stuff dead rotting flesh into their bodies.
 
Last edited:
I said 5 to 6 dinners per week. But, unlike many Americans, that doesn't mean sitting down to half a cow, it might mean one chicken leg, or a small piece of beef. If I skip having meat, then it some other dairy product or eggs that provides a source of protein and fat.

I've always known meat comes from animals, I wasn't one of those kids raised oblivious to this seemingly obvious fact. I don't know what you imply when you say people disregard the suffering of the animal; well, no, I do know what you imply, but don't like the way its phrased, that assumes the animals are suffering, and that eating meat requires animal suffering. No matter what PC arguments people use, humans are still omnivores and intended to eat meat. I don't think people who eat meat are "focused" on meat, it's just a normal part of our diets. And I don't think satisfying nutritional requirements is strange. If you choose to eat a vegetarian diet, go ahead and do so, but if your argument is animal suffering, keep in mind all those crops are displacing animals from their natural environment, pumping pesticides and fertilizers into the environment, killing off tons of insects and other invertebrates (maybe they don't count since they aren't cute and furry). There are a lot of people on the planet, we need food, there is no way to provide that much food without having an impact on the environment.
 
Monique said:
How much does meat play a part in your diner? I find it so strange that people are so focussed on meat and disregard the suffering of an animal that ends up on their plate.

Do you think a diner can not be served without meat, or that you'd be able to adept a vegetarian diet?
Of course, but animals were put on Earth for a purpose -- to be eaten (some of them at least).
I don't understand vegetarians.
 
scarecrow said:
Of course, but animals were put on Earth for a purpose -- to be eaten (some of them at least).
I don't understand vegetarians.

There's nothing challenging to understand there. As I mentioned, humans are omnivores. You can satisfy your nutritional requirements with a vegetarian diet as well as with a diet including meat, and if that's your preference, that's fine. However, what I don't like is when vegetarians fling around a high-and-mighty attitude that their diet is better for the planet than a meat-containing diet, when that's just not true. The impacts are different, but real nonetheless. And it's no better when meat-eaters fling around an attitude that animals were put on the planet just for them to eat. Neither argument holds up. Go with your own preferences. What's the most natural diet that has the least damage to the environment? The one that allows lots of humans to starve to death. I think we've already decided to avoid what nature recommends.
 
*wipes face* I am eating meat as I type this :smile:
 
I eat meat 14 times a week. Lunch and dinner, (never for breakfast). Am I an animal?
 
  • #10
Monique said:
How much does meat play a part in your diner?
I choose "always" - I almost never have a dinner without meat.

Most of this is a discussion for the "other" thread, but real quick:
I find it so strange that people are so focussed on meat and disregard the suffering of an animal that ends up on their plate.
I don't eat veal - most, if not all, veal comes from mistreated calves. Other cattle are generally a different story. Fish are a non-issue since most are caught wild. Chickens are probably the toughest, because the worst treatment is of those that are used to make eggs.
Do you think a diner can not be served without meat, or that you'd be able to adept a vegetarian diet?
I think I could adapt to a vegitarian diet if I absolutely had to. But I wouldn't do it by choice.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
  • #11
Well, I hate "vegeterians"!
 
  • #12
somy said:
Well, I hate "vegeterians"!
:cry: Well, meat eaters stink!
 
  • #13
:rolleyes: why would you hate vegetarians

And Moonbear, I don't mean to say that meat-eaters are bad. I mean to say that factory meat should not be in our diet: animals that grow up in steal cages where they can't move an inch. How would one know that the meat on your plate is not of that origin?

And who says eating meat should be given up entirely. Moderation is the key I'm looking for, together with creativity. I stopped eating meat in my diner completely and I haven't missed it a day, there are just too many other options :blushing:
 
  • #14
and I think restaurants should be cathering more towards vegetarians.. often there is not a single dish on the menu vegetarian.. what's that all about? :bugeye:
 
  • #15
Moonbear said:
. . . that assumes the animals are suffering, and that eating meat requires animal suffering. . . . .what I don't like is when vegetarians fling around a high-and-mighty attitude that their diet is better for the planet than a meat-containing diet, when that's just not true. The impacts are different, but real nonetheless.

I agree with you about the "high-and-mighty attitude" thing; besides, humanity has far more serious issues to worry about.

However, I have to disagree with you about both the cruelty and the impact to Earth from meat eating versus that of plant eating. It is unbearable to see what animals go through to become food, and the scale of it is gruesome too. I suspect that one involved in mass slaughter has to desensitize to be able to ignore the animals' plight. . . sort of just see them as a hunk of meat without feelings. If animals were given a comfortable life and a compassionate death I don't see how animal lovers could object (given that nature is set up for killing and eating animals). It would then be just a personal matter.

In terms of the impact on the planet, it takes a lot more grain to fatten a cow than it does to just eat the grain, about 40 times more (i.e., 40 pounds of grain produce one pound of meat). So the impact on the environment is significantly greater.
 
  • #16
Monique said:
and I think restaurants should be cathering more towards vegetarians.. often there is not a single dish on the menu vegetarian.. what's that all about? :bugeye:

Vegetarians . . . the new oppressed class. :frown: I think we need our rights preserved with anti-discrimination laws, protection from hate crimes (like meat-eaters secretly spiking the soup with chicken broth,etc.), and a tax break because it costs more to eat healthy (due to lack of mass production).
 
  • #17
Monique said:
And Moonbear, I don't mean to say that meat-eaters are bad. I mean to say that factory meat should not be in our diet: animals that grow up in steal cages where they can't move an inch. How would one know that the meat on your plate is not of that origin?
Because, except for chicken, that makes up a relatively small fraction of the meat people eat. I prefer beef anyway. :biggrin:
and I think restaurants should be cathering more towards vegetarians.. often there is not a single dish on the menu vegetarian.. what's that all about?
Do I need to say that dirty word? Capitalism!
 
  • #18
My lunch almost always involves meat - I eat lunch out, everyday :eek: - but dinner, rarely.
 
  • #19
Les Sleeth said:
I think we need our rights preserved with anti-discrimination laws

I hope you're not serious. :-p A restaurant should be able to serve whatever its owners choose to serve. You might as well sue a felafel place for not serving meat, or a hardware store for not having the type of tool you need, or something equally ludicrous.

If anything, the onus is on the vegetarian to check the menu and make sure the restaurant in question is suitable for him/her. Failing that, hey, there's always the bread, and that's free! (Personally, I feel greatly discriminated against that restaurants never offer free meat-based appetizers.)
 
  • #20
Les Sleeth said:
(snip)In terms of the impact on the planet, it takes a lot more grain to fatten a cow than it does to just eat the grain, about 40 times more (i.e., 40 pounds of grain produce one pound of meat). (snip).

"40 pounds?" This fabrication has to contribute enormously to the disdain, scorn, lack of respect the world exhibits toward "vegans." From new calf to slaughterhouse takes 2-3 yrs --- mammals go through 3-10 times their body mass per yr --- an exclusive grain diet for cattle? Call the vet.

The "40" is "8" in DD's thread in "values" --- possible for Kobe beef --- but not a generally credible figure for the beef industry. Hyperbole ("hype" for short) is great for politicians, used car salesmen, hucksters, flim-flammers, and other frauds, but don't expect to be taken seriously when you quote numbers from sources that just make them up for the occasion.
 
  • #21
My only comments on vegetarian diets: Oak BBQ'd ribeye steaks or death! There are no other options.

Vegetables are rabbit food. I eat rabbits

:biggrin:
 
  • #22
hypnagogue said:
I hope you're not serious. :-p A restaurant should be able to serve whatever its owners choose to serve. You might as well sue a felafel place for not serving meat, or a hardware store for not having the type of tool you need, or something equally ludicrous.

If anything, the onus is on the vegetarian to check the menu and make sure the restaurant in question is suitable for him/her. Failing that, hey, there's always the bread, and that's free! (Personally, I feel greatly discriminated against that restaurants never offer free meat-based appetizers.)

I was just kidding. However, I have been poisoned, as has my wife, several times after inquiring if some dish was meat free and told it was. Usually it is chicken broth added to the soup, or to the water to make rice (like for esp. Mexican dishes). Sometimes it is beef broth in sauces, and other times we suspect it is from cooking veggies on the same grill as meat, or frying in the same oil. To say "poisoned" might sound overdramatic, but the consequences always involve nausea and diarrhea, and on occasion has involved hurling one's dinner on the way home from the restaurant. Once one's system is clear of meat, the body doesn't handle it well.
 
  • #23
I not only eat,but somtimes kill my dinner... :-p

MEAT IS PROTEINS,FIBER AND HEALTH...

Daniel.
 
  • #24
Bystander said:
"40 pounds?" This fabrication has to contribute enormously to the disdain, scorn, lack of respect the world exhibits toward "vegans."

Exactly what "disdain, scorn, lack of respect the world exhibits toward vegans'" are you referring to? Why should anyone care what I choose to eat? No one has ever treated me badly because of what I eat, and I don't judge others. Only a moron would look down on someone because of their diet.


Bystander said:
From new calf to slaughterhouse takes 2-3 yrs --- mammals go through 3-10 times their body mass per yr --- an exclusive grain diet for cattle? Call the vet. The "40" is "8" in DD's thread in "values" --- possible for Kobe beef --- but not a generally credible figure for the beef industry.

I took my figures from "Diet for a Small Planet." The book is at least 20 years old, and maybe he did exaggerate, though I've never heard that criticism. I've repeated that figure many times over the years and never had anyone challenge it, so there was no attempt at misrepresentation on my part. However, even if the figure is 8 (or for that matter 2!), that is quite a significant increase in impact on the planet, wouldn't you agree?


Bystander said:
Hyperbole ("hype" for short) is great for politicians, used car salesmen, hucksters, flim-flammers, and other frauds, but don't expect to be taken seriously when you quote numbers from sources that just make them up for the occasion.

I've been eating without meat for so long I don't even think about it. It is no "cause" for me. In fact, when people say "I hear you are a vegetarian" I aways say, "no, I just don't eat meat." It's not a "trip" or a discipline. It's strictly because I feel better when I don't eat it plus the taste now disgusts me.

So why would I be interested in hyperbole? I couldn't possibly care less how much grease you choose to pack your veins with. However, I have heard meat can make one aggressive, mean-spirited, lacking in compassion . . .
 
Last edited:
  • #25
i eat meat for the iron, mostly fish, chicken, and turkey about 3-4 times per week and have vegetarian dishes the rest of the week. when i was pregnant with both of my kids, the doctor recommended eating more meat as i was borderline anemic. yes, i agree that the mass production of animals is horrific, however, overpopulation has forced this. trying to change this is like trying to get hybrid cars in america.

i don't see my meat eating as a disgraceful thing at all because i am grateful to have food on my plate at all, let alone good food. beans, rice and pastas are a main staple in my diet as well as the different meat i choose to eat.

here where i live, many restaurants cater to the vegetarian lifestyle with respect. but i have to agree with Moonbear regarding the arrogance some vegetarians are lending to make it difficult for the majority just trying to do what they feel is right for their choices.
 
  • #26
Quite often. I will only eat red meat from cattle though and a very small amount of pork. Won't eat fish/seafood, poultry, game, veal, eggs etc.

I was a vegetarian for oh, about a decade. It didn't work out too well [obviously] :biggrin:

My parents recipes are scottish so basically all have some form of beef heh. We eat lots of meat pies, shepherds pie, forfar bridies, meat loaf, steak, burgers, beef stew, roasts and mince yummy :smile:
Yep guess I eat lots of meat. We do eat other foods too, but those are the basics... very much a meat and potatoes family :-p
 
Last edited:
  • #27
hypnagogue said:
If anything, the onus is on the vegetarian to check the menu and make sure the restaurant in question is suitable for him/her.
So you sit down comfortably in a restaurant, order a drink, go read the menu, find out there is nothing vegetarian, walk out and find another place :rolleyes:

Or you look at the menu, realize there is even meat in all the salads, you have an ass-clown waiter who does not want to serve you, you wait and wait and wait in order to ask whether they can make something vegetarian, to find out that the blunt answer is 'No' and you find yourself looking for another place :devil:

BUT there is always Indian restaurants, a vegetarian's heaven o:)
 
  • #28
I go about 3-4 times a week ... try to stick with chicken and turkey as much as possible, but at times am carnivorous enough to enjoy a good steak. In my case I do quite a bit of sports and as such getting enough protein is a high priority, getting most of the energy carbs is a difficult diet, even though quite a necessity. Have at times tried to direct more towards vegetarian, but always fails when I get bored eating the required massive volumes :biggrin: .
 
  • #29
When you all are saying vegetarian. Do you mean just not eating meat? Or do you mean not eating any form of life? Plants, things that grow, etc, meaning that you only eat artificial food?
 
  • #30
Recognize the word vegetable in the word vegetarian?
 
  • #31
Monique said:
So you sit down comfortably in a restaurant, order a drink, go read the menu, find out there is nothing vegetarian, walk out and find another place :rolleyes:

No, you ask to see the menu before you go in and get comfortable. (Of course I can't speak for any restaurants outside of the US, but in my experience most restaurants will have a menu available for perusing at the door, upon request. Many even have the menu displayed in the window.) I check out the menu before I go into a restaurant in most circumstances, although I do it to make sure I don't have to pay exorbitant prices more than anything else.
 
  • #32
Monique said:
So you sit down comfortably in a restaurant, order a drink, go read the menu, find out there is nothing vegetarian, walk out and find another place :rolleyes:

Ask to see a menu before you request a table. I've done that many times, not in search of vegetarian cuisine, but just to find out if a new restaurant is a place I'm interested in eating and whether the price range is acceptable. Not to say I haven't walked out of restaurants for other reasons, including lack of a non-smoking section, or after seated, if they don't enforce their non-smoking policy or I find that the non-smoking section is only separated by a half wall from the smoking section, if I have to wait a very long time for the server to appear to take my order, or find that they overcook all the meat (usually some chain restaurant where they refuse to serve meat any less done than medium), or they seem to have run out of all the dishes I was considering ordering. When I walk out after being seated, I tell the waitperson my reason, and unless they are the reason, will still leave them a small tip for their trouble. If you walk out because they don't have any vegetarian options, let them know this. If restaurant owners find out people are walking away because their menu is lacking something that is in demand, they may consider changing the menu. They may not add a lot of variety if there is a limited demand, but perhaps they'd add one or two vegetarion selections so you could join your other friends for a meal. Of course, if you're the only one who says anything to them, then you'll probably just have to look for other places to eat that meet your tastes.

I've also found that if there is something you really do not wish to eat (such as meat products, including broths, etc), the easiest approach to get an honest answer out of a slacking server is to tell them you are very allergic to it and it's really important to know if any of the ingredients have it in it.

Les, "Diet for a Small Planet" contains many inaccurate numbers regarding animal feed requirements. Not the least of which is that humans are even less efficient at converting the energy in grains to muscle mass than are herbivores such as cattle, and one cow feeds a LOT of people.
 
  • #33
Monique said:
Recognize the word vegetable in the word vegetarian?

No I don't :smile:

But some vegetarians go over the edge, or are those vegans? This is why I wanted some clarity.

One good thing about this thread is that it has made me realize another argument against vegetarians and pro-life. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
  • #34
Monique said:
Recognize the word vegetable in the word vegetarian?

Nope,but i recognize the word "arian"... :-p

Anyway,it's cheaper to eat meat...

Daniel.
 
  • #35
mattmns said:
No I don't :smile:

But some vegetarians go over the edge, or are those vegans? This is why I wanted some clarity.

One good thing about this thread is that it has made me realize another argument against vegetarians and pro-life. Thanks.

Vegan means they eat NO animal products at all, which means no egg or dairy either, while vegetarian means they might include some animal proteins (some dairy or egg), though usually in very limited amounts. Some people still call themselves vegetarian even if they eat some fish, so the term does get confusing.
 
  • #36
Meat is essential as it provides vital trace elements to the part of your brain that tells you tie-dye isn't cool.
 
  • #37
Zing! character limit filler >:(
 
  • #38
mattmns said:
One good thing about this thread is that it has made me realize another argument against vegetarians and pro-life. Thanks.
And that argument would be? :rolleyes:

Moonbear said:
Vegan means they eat NO animal products at all, which means no egg or dairy either, while vegetarian means they might include some animal proteins (some dairy or egg), though usually in very limited amounts. Some people still call themselves vegetarian even if they eat some fish, so the term does get confusing.
I think it is more of a life style than a dictionary definition, at least it can be. I stopped eating meat, but I would not call myself a hardcore vegetarian. If my parents serve me a dish with meat, I'd still eat it mainly because I don't think it's a sin to eat meat and probably also that I'm still used to eating meat.

You stop smoking because it's bad for you, but it should be ok to have a sigarette at a party once in a while (as long as you don't go back into the old habit).
 
  • #39
Monique said:
And that argument would be? :rolleyes:

Woops I wrote that a bit unclear. The argument is for all those people who say that if you are pro-life (anti-abortion as far as I am concerned), you can not eat meat (because pro life includes animals). The argument (or I guess point) is that if you are pro life (by their definition) you must not eat animals, plants, or anything that contains any form of life in it. This may not make sense because that is what I just said; however, when someone told me this they said vegetarian. So now if someone says that if you are pro life you should also be a vegetarian, I can tell them no, you must a full blown vegan, because pro life means all life. Blah this is turning out complicated, I know what I meant though, so I am ok :smile:

Thanks for the clarity Moonbear.
 
Last edited:
  • #40
I understand several of the reasons that people choose to not eat meat. Health, it has a face, agro-economics, the animals humane treatment, etc...But what I don't understand is why those that choose that particular lifestyle choose to be the initiators of what they know will become an argument when they confront those that think differently. It kind of seems like religious people knocking on your door to spread their word and then becoming aggressive when you say "No" and try to close the door. Each has a choice. I have family members that are attempting a Vegan lifestyle and have come to accept them for what they are. I don't like it but I love them and admire their moral standing. 4-H and FFA taught me to care for my livestock and to respect what they provide. It's unfortunate that animals wiggle when being slaughtered but you can't take part of a cow and let it walk around until you need more...or can you.
 
  • #41
Monique said:
BUT there is always Indian restaurants, a vegetarian's heaven o:)
I was recently amazed to see that my favorite Indian restaurant has started serving a beef dish! :confused: Apperently the new owners made some changes to the menu!

I know one of the waiters there so I asked him what was up with that. "I know", he said, "I don't like it. I can't even stand the smell of it." I don't think he's going to work there for much longer. I could tell it really bothered him. :frown:
 
  • #42
Moonbear said:
Les, "Diet for a Small Planet" contains many inaccurate numbers regarding animal feed requirements. Not the least of which is that humans are even less efficient at converting the energy in grains to muscle mass than are herbivores such as cattle, and one cow feeds a LOT of people.

In my original listing of that as a reference I included a disclaimer about the facts of the book, but then I deleted it feeling the post was getting too long. But as I pointed out, even if it is 8 times, that's significant. Also, I wonder how much long term health costs contribute to the "price" of eating meat.

But I know for a fact that I can live on grains, veggies, beans, nuts and fruits quite nicely (I like to include brewers yeast, the best kept health secret on the planet). In fact large part of the world does that, and always has. I lived on it for eight of the heathiest years of my life. When I met my current wife, she ate cheese so I started back up, but at the expense of dealing with excess mucus, longer digestion times, and some loss in ease of elimination. I still only eat cheese once or twice per week (love pizza too much).

Regarding humans being "less efficient at converting the energy in grains to muscle mass," something I found was that after giving up meat, I seemed able to get by on very little food (besides, once we reach adulthood, why do we need to worry much about building muscle mass?). I remember when I was eating meat three times a day, it seemed like I was really hungry at mealtime, and I would eat lots. A few years later, I was getting by on something like what I have had today: an orange first thing in the morn; a little later my daily cappacino; then two pieces of 100% toasted sprouted bread with cold pressed oil brushed on . . . that sort of is my "morning food." Just now for "afternoon food" I had half an avocado with mustard in the middle, a couple of ounces of baked (not fried :-p ) pototo chips; later afternoon food will probably be a handful of tamari roasted cashews I made last night. For "evening food" I am planning homemade veggie tomato soup with brown rice mixed in; later I might have something sweet like dates or figs, or a little ice cream. That's it! (Except for my brewers yeast and vitamins.)

Now, my friends say I eat like a bird, but I still manage to run circles around them on the racquetball court, and get over any sort of bug I catch a lot faster than they do. I've eaten both ways (meat and not) I know that for me I am much healthier, feel much better, digest food much eaiser, eat much less, and enjoy a greater variety of foods without meat. So the reason for my diet isn't anything "high," it is pure self interest. That's also why I don't think people should be telling others how they should eat; anything I say along those lines to meat eaters is totally good-natured teasing, and they tease me too (geez, I'd be virtually friendless and familyless if I condemned meat eaters). If you like meat, then I say go for it. If not, then that's cool too. It is completely a personal thing (if we leave animal treatment out of it).
 
Last edited:
  • #43
Echo 6 Sierra said:
. . . what I don't understand is why those that choose that particular lifestyle choose to be the initiators of what they know will become an argument when they confront those that think differently.

I agree! I am amazed at how long the "should we eat meat" thread has gone on. :bugeye: It seems like such a non-issue from a "should" perspective. I can see people sharing their dietary knowledge and so on. But the morality of a diet? :confused:
 
  • #44
View Poll Results: I eat meat with a meal
never 3 10.00%
1-2 per week 2 6.67%
3-4 per week 6 20.00%
5-6 per week 8 26.67%
always 11 36.67%
Voters: 30. You have already voted on this poll



Has someone voted twice??Has someone messed up the computer??It's more than 100% when u add them? :-p

Daniel...
 
  • #45
mattmns said:
Woops I wrote that a bit unclear. The argument is for all those people who say that if you are pro-life (anti-abortion as far as I am concerned), you can not eat meat (because pro life includes animals). The argument (or I guess point) is that if you are pro life (by their definition) you must not eat animals, plants, or anything that contains any form of life in it. This may not make sense because that is what I just said; however, when someone told me this they said vegetarian. So now if someone says that if you are pro life you should also be a vegetarian, I can tell them no, you must a full blown vegan, because pro life means all life. Blah this is turning out complicated, I know what I meant though, so I am ok :smile:

Thanks for the clarity Moonbear.

Not all vegetarians are pro-life. I am pro-choice because I base my morals on logic, and I believe that being pro-choice is most logical. What has not been incorporated into society has no value to society. I am vegetarian because I believe the slaughtering of animals is unbeneficial to humanity. Meat eating, in addition to being unhealthier than vegetarianism, also deprives humans of what animals can contribute to society.
 
  • #46
dextercioby said:
Has someone voted twice??Has someone messed up the computer??It's more than 100% when u add them? :-p

It comes out to 100.01. Probably just round off error.
 
  • #47
Echo 6 Sierra said:
But what I don't understand is why those that choose that particular lifestyle choose to be the initiators of what they know will become an argument when they confront those that think differently.
How often do you get confonted about this issue? For one, no one forced you to enter this discussion :rolleyes: I don't think it's a bad thing to engage in discussions.
 
  • #48
Monique said:
How often do you get confonted about this issue? For one, no one forced you to enter this discussion :rolleyes: I don't think it's a bad thing to engage in discussions.

Monique, I at least wasn't being critical of your thread concept when I agreed with Echo6. I thought he was referring to some of the animal rights people who think they have a right to force their views about eating animals. I totally agree about kindness to animals destined for slaughter, but I disagree that anyone should moralize about eating meat.
 
  • #49
I know :smile: I too think everyone is responsible for their own health. But at the same time no one should ignore the fact that the quality live of livestock should be inspected.
 
Last edited:
  • #50
Dooga Blackrazor said:
Not all vegetarians are pro-life.

mattmns said:
The argument is for all those people who say that if you are pro-life (anti-abortion as far as I am concerned), you can not eat meat (because pro life includes animals).

I am not saying it that way. I am saying it the other way around. Also, I do not agree with people who say that if you are pro-life you should not eat meat. You took this the wrong way. The reason I said this was because of a conversation I had with someone a while back about abortion (being pro-life) and vegetarians. She said that if you were pro-life you should also be a vegetarian. I disagreed with this, but could only come up with a defintion of pro-life argument. Now if we talk about this again and she brings up that same point, I can say that well you should not eat any form of life at all (ie. plants, things that grow, etc). I do not believe this, but I think it is a decent counter.
 
Back
Top