Mechanical Engineering 3D force system

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a homework problem involving a system of cables suspending a crate, focusing on determining the tensions in the cable segments. Participants explore the coordinates of various points in a three-dimensional space, the relationships between angles and forces, and the application of vector algebra to solve the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states the need to find the coordinates for points A, B, C, D, E, and F, starting from known coordinates for C and D.
  • Another participant confirms that points A, B, C, and D lie in the xz-plane and provides coordinates for D and C.
  • Further contributions suggest different coordinates for points E and F, with some participants emphasizing the importance of angles over actual distances in solving the problem.
  • There is a discussion about treating point A as a 2D problem in the xz-plane, with some participants questioning the clarity of previous statements regarding the planes involved.
  • A later reply suggests using vector algebra with i, j, k terms and emphasizes the need for three equations for the three unknowns to solve for the forces.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the placement of points in the xz-plane but have differing views on the exact coordinates of points E and F, as well as the approach to solving the problem. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best method to find the tensions in the cables.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the clarity of the coordinate definitions and the assumptions made about the relationships between the angles and distances. Some mathematical steps remain unresolved, particularly in the application of vector algebra.

sami23
Messages
69
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A system of cables suspends a crate weighing W = 420 lb. The dimensions in the figure are as follows: h = 20.9 ft, l = 5.70 ft, x = 7.05 ft, \theta = 36.0\circ, and \phi = 20.0\circ. Determine TA, TD, and TE, the tensions in cable segments CA, CD, and CE, respectively.


Homework Equations


vector F = (magnitude F)(unit vector)
\sumF = 0
FCA + FCB + FCD + FCE + FCF + W = 0

The Attempt at a Solution


How do I start by finding the coordinates:
C(0,0,0), D(x,0,h), A(?) E(?)

I can't see how to find the correct coordinates A,B,C,D,E,F
 

Attachments

  • crate.jpg
    crate.jpg
    9.7 KB · Views: 739
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you agree that A B C and D all lie in the xz plane?
 
yes they do. coordinates for D:(7.05,0,20.9)
C is at origin (0,0,0)
E and F are at some weird y plane (here's my attempt)
E: (x,l,-h)
F: (-x,-2l,-h)
A is all over the place with a weight
 
It looks to me like E is at 0, l, -h and F is at 0, -l, -h
For the vagueness of A, you might realize that it's the angles that matter. The forces are independent of the actual distances. more dependent on distance ratios, that is angles. So to solve it you could say: Without loss of generality x of A=1 etc
 
I see how E(0,l,-h) and F(0,-l,-h). They're at the same y-plane just at opposite ends.
Now A makes those angles at the x-plane. AB forms phi and AC forms theta. All I really know about B is that it's in the -h z-plane. Can I treat A as a 2D problem in the xz-plane?
 
Sloppy language when saying "They're at the same y-plane just at opposite ends", when you mean y-z plane. When you say "All I really know about B is that it's in the -h z-plane" I think you should say ...in the x-z plane.
When I said that WLOG, x of A can be set at unity, I implied that x of B can similarly be attributed a distance as long as it is bigger that x of A.
If you suppress the y-axis and look only at the x-z plane with E on top of F, you will get a meaningful result for DC CA and AB, but the result for C to EF will need to be partitioned in the y-z plane. That's the simple way to look at it. Or you could invoke vector algebra with i j k terms. If you start with the joint at A, you can solve the forces there. Then you have enough information to go to C, where you will need three equations for the three unknowns. That's where 3 reference axes are helpful to bring the question to a successful conclusion. Can you do it now?
 
thanks
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K