1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Mechanical Principals Assignment Question

  1. Jan 4, 2017 #1
    • Member warned to use the homework template for posts in the homework sections of PF.
    I have a long question in my assignment with many part answers and I would just like to know if I have answered them correctly as I have spend a lot of time on it. can anyone help?

    My Question is:

    The component shown in Fig 1 is made from a material with the following properties and is subjected to a compressive force of 5kN.
    upload_2017-1-4_9-51-9.png
    Material Properties
    Young’s Modulus of -200 GN m^-2
    Elasticity Modulus of Rigidity -90 GN m^-2
    Poisons ratio - 0.32


    Q1a. Calculate the stress in:

    (i) the circular section

    (ii) the square section

    My Solution:
    upload_2017-1-4_9-57-33.png
    Does This Look Correct?

    Q1b. Calculate the strain in:

    (i) The circular section

    (ii) The square section
    upload_2017-1-4_9-59-44.png
    Does This Look ok?

    Q1c. The change in length of the component
    upload_2017-1-4_10-2-22.png

    Q1d. The change in diameter of the circular section
    upload_2017-1-4_10-7-41.png
    Q1e. The change in the 40mm dimension on the square section
    upload_2017-1-4_10-8-44.png
    Q1f. If the same component were subjected to as shown in FIG 2, calculate the shear strain in:

    (i) The Circular section
    (ii) The Square section
    upload_2017-1-4_10-11-20.png

    Any help or advice would be much appreciated. Thanks
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 4, 2017 #2
    1a. Looks OK to me.
    1b. Wrong units for strain. Strain is dimensionless (and in this case negative).
    1c. Be careful with signs and units. 0.002121 is not equal to -2.121 x 10-3. And -2.121 x 10-3 what? You are mixing units too much, and getting confused. I would convert everything into m (and Pa etc.)
    1d. Change in length is not 7.75. What length is being referred to? (Why don't you just do it like 1e?)
    1e. OK, but what are the units of the answer?
    1f. As there is no Fig 2, this is impossible.
     
  4. Jan 4, 2017 #3
    Thanks for your help, I rushed the first part of the assignment because I was working to a deadline. That deadline was removed and now I have more time to think.
    I have reworked Q1a although you said it was ok, I couldnt work out how I got the area values I had wrote down and also my answers are now positive? should they be Negative?

    upload_2017-1-4_15-23-7.png
     
  5. Jan 4, 2017 #4
    No, you had it right the first time. A uniaxial stress is applied in the z direction. There is no applied stress in the x or y directions. The area to use is ##\pi##r2 or wl. And a compressive stress is negative. (And areas don't have units of mm3. And 1000 mm3 is not 1 m3, nor is 1000 mm2 1 m2. You are causing yourself a lot of unnecessary problems simply by being sloppy.)
     
  6. Jan 5, 2017 #5
    upload_2017-1-5_9-48-34.png
    I have used the area previously used and obtained a figure the same but I still have a unit measurement difference. I am not sure the first unit of MPa was correct because of the conversion of mm into m. Previously I calculated m from mm by x10^-6 when it should have been x 10^-3. Am I correct in this error?
     
  7. Jan 5, 2017 #6
    1000mm does equal 1 meter?
     
  8. Jan 5, 2017 #7
    Ahh I see my problem! 1.6^2 = 2.56 where 1600^2 = 2560000 which is x10^-6. Looks like I have answered my own question there. Sorry about that, I was thinking out loud!
     
  9. Jan 5, 2017 #8
    Yes, but 1000 mm2 does not equal 1 m2. Just picture a circle 30 mm in diameter. Do you think its area is anywhere near 1 m2?
     
  10. Jan 5, 2017 #9
    Does this look ok for part b?

    upload_2017-1-5_10-25-57.png
     
  11. Jan 5, 2017 #10
    You are mixing units again! That's -7.074 MPa/200 GPa = -0.0354 x 10-3! You got it right (apart from the sign) in part c - 3.3535 x 10-5
     
  12. Jan 5, 2017 #11
    upload_2017-1-5_11-2-21.png
    Does This look better?
     
  13. Jan 5, 2017 #12
    Reworked part c
    upload_2017-1-5_11-24-12.png
     

    Attached Files:

  14. Jan 5, 2017 #13
    That looks better. But what's with all the ≈ signs? You're asked to calculate a value, not estimate an approximate value. I would calculate it precisely, then round to the appropriate number of significant figures at the end.
     
  15. Jan 5, 2017 #14
    I must be mistaken but I thought my use of the algibraic ≈ was suitable for my final answer. I have used it in previous assignments which were marked with distinction but never mentioned. I will stick with the standard = in future.

    When you said calculate it precisely, then round to the appropriate number of significant figures at the end. I understand it effects my final answer, but do you think my answer is not accurate enough to be accepted on this occasion?
     
  16. Jan 5, 2017 #15
    Considering the numbers you were given, I think 2 sig figs is OK for an answer, but if you're going on to use those results in other calculations, you should use the more precise values for that purpose.
     
  17. Jan 5, 2017 #16
    Reworked answers to D and E?
    upload_2017-1-5_13-36-17.png
     

    Attached Files:

  18. Jan 5, 2017 #17
    d. Poisson's ratio is positive, so the diameter increases.
    e. Wrong - you have used the change in length instead of the strain.
     
  19. Jan 6, 2017 #18
    From the Question given, It shows the Poissons ratio to be Negative? I undertand a compression on the top of a cylinder would increase the diameter of the midsection but how would I change the given figure to suit this answer?

    If I remove the negative symbol my previous workings for part d, I get the same answer but as a positive. Is this acceptable?

    and for part 'e'my reworkings are:
    upload_2017-1-6_10-2-36.png
     
  20. Jan 6, 2017 #19
    In your first post you said '(Why dont you do it like in 1e?)'

    So here is my answer in the same method as 1e and it is positive, and different from my previous calculation.
    upload_2017-1-6_10-14-40.png
     
  21. Jan 6, 2017 #20
    I think you are confusing dashes with minus signs. Do you think the Young's modulus is -200 GPa? You haven't used a negative value in your calculations! Poisson's ratio for ordinary materials is positive. When you compress them uniaxially, they expand in the transverse directions. (There are a few exotic materials which have a negative PR, with niche applications.)
    What are you doing in part e? You have replaced the change in length with the strain, but you get the same (wrong) answer as before! Didn't you redo the calculation?
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Mechanical Principals Assignment Question
  1. Mechanics Assignment (Replies: 6)

Loading...