Undergrad Mechanics of Rolling and Striking Cones

  • Thread starter Thread starter EngineeringFuture
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cone Rolling
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mechanics of rolling conical objects, specifically whether a cone can roll in a straight line. It is established that a cone can roll if different forces are applied at various points, but it cannot maintain straight-line motion solely through inertia if the apex remains in contact with the surface. The conversation highlights the implications of varying circumferences on rolling motion, emphasizing that friction prevents free rolling on flat surfaces. Additionally, the use of conical rollers in tapered roller bearings is noted as a practical application of these principles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics principles related to motion and forces
  • Familiarity with the concept of friction and its effects on rolling objects
  • Knowledge of geometric shapes, specifically cones and their properties
  • Basic comprehension of mechanical components like tapered roller bearings
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the physics of rolling motion and the role of friction in different shapes
  • Explore the design and function of tapered roller bearings in mechanical systems
  • Investigate the mathematical modeling of rolling objects with varying circumferences
  • Experiment with creating and rolling conical shapes to observe motion dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in the dynamics of rolling objects and their applications in engineering design.

EngineeringFuture
Messages
11
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
Mechanics of rolling cones
Does an object have to be either spherical or cylindrical to be rolled in a straight line. Could an approximately conical object be rolled in a straight line or struck to roll in a straight line? A cone can be rolled in a straight line if different forces are applied at different spots, but once the force is no longer applied, can a cone keep rolling by its inertia alone?

I believe the answer is no, not if the apex of the cone remains on the surface, but I think there are unusual surfaces where a cone of non-uniform density where a cone would slightly deform so the apex would lift into the air and the cone would keep rolling.

Also, my terminology is terrible, so please excuse my terminology. There is one concept that I'm thinking about but can't express.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the circumference of the roller varies, like a cone or frustum, and remains in frictional contact with the flat surface, then the friction will prevent free rolling motion in a straight line, on a flat surface.
 
  • Like
Likes EngineeringFuture
Baluncore said:
If the circumference of the roller varies, like a cone or frustum, and remains in frictional contact with the flat surface, then the friction will prevent free rolling motion in a straight line, on a flat surface.
Do you have any links I could see with the diagrams and math worked out?
 
EngineeringFuture said:
Do you have any links I could see with the diagrams and math worked out?
This is more fundamental than mathematics.

Make a conical roller from a sheet of paper and some sticky tape, like a witches hat. Roll it in a straight line and watch how it slips.

If wheels of different circumference, rotate at the same rate, they will travel different distances along arcs of different radii.

When you drive a car around a corner, the wheels on either side rotate at different rates. That is why there is a differential gear.

Conical rollers are used in tapered roller bearings, where the path lengths are in proportion to the roller circumference.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur and EngineeringFuture
EngineeringFuture said:
Could an approximately conical object be rolled in a straight line...
Sure, even uphill.

 
  • Like
Likes EngineeringFuture
EngineeringFuture said:
TL;DR Summary: Mechanics of rolling cones

A cone can be rolled in a straight line if different forces are applied at different spots,
If the cone is a solid material and the contact with the floor doesn't slip then that is not true.

Why? If the cone rotates once then the distance travelled (on a plane surface) by the part with least radius (r1) will be 2πr1 (the circumference) and the distance travelled by a part near the maximum radius (r2) will travel 2πr2. That implies the fat end travels further than the thin end. That isn't in a straight line. To force a straight line you have to let every part slip.
 
  • Like
Likes EngineeringFuture
sophiecentaur said:
If the cone is a solid material and the contact with the floor doesn't slip then that is not true.

Why? If the cone rotates once then the distance travelled (on a plane surface) by the part with least radius (r1) will be 2πr1 (the circumference) and the distance travelled by a part near the maximum radius (r2) will travel 2πr2. That implies the fat end travels further than the thin end. That isn't in a straight line. To force a straight line you have to let every part slip.
You're absolutely correct. I was an idiot above.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur and Baluncore

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 116 ·
4
Replies
116
Views
13K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K