Mechanics Problems, involving spring system and gravitation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a mechanics problem involving a spring system and gravitational forces. A platform weighing 10 N is supported by two springs in parallel, each with a spring constant of 75 N/m, while a third spring with the same constant is placed on top. Participants debate the correct approach to calculate the system's height change when a 5 N ball is added, with confusion about whether the springs are in series or parallel. Clarifications are made regarding the classification of springs based on their arrangement, emphasizing the need to derive force balance equations rather than relying solely on equivalent spring constants. The conversation highlights the complexities of analyzing spring systems and the importance of understanding their configurations.
Thundagere
Messages
159
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A spring system is set up as follows: a platform with a weight of 10 N is on top of two springs, each with spring constant 75 N/m. On top of the platform is a third spring with spring constant 75 N/m. If a ball with a weight of 5.0 N is then fastened to the top of the third spring and then slowly lowered, by how much does the height of the spring system change?

http://img856.imageshack.us/img856/4352/screenshot20130127at101.png

Homework Equations



Ktotal parallel = K1 + K2 + ... Kn
F = -kx

The Attempt at a Solution


Initially, I tried adding up all the springs in the system for an equivalent spring of 210 N/m, and then solving. That didn't work and the answer was incorrect. I feel like the 5 N ball will make the first spring push back some, and the 2nd and 3rd springs push back with a different amount of force. The trouble is, I'm lacking the conceptual understanding of how to go about calculating those values.


Homework Statement



Consider the two orbits around the sun shown below. Orbit P is circular with radius R, orbit Q is elliptical such that the farthest point b is between 2R and 3R, and the nearest point a is between R/3 and R/2. Consider the magnitudes of the velocity of the circular orbit vc, the velocity of the comet in the elliptical orbit at the farthest point vb, and the velocity of the comet in the elliptical orbit at the nearest point va. Which of the following rankings
is correct?
(A) vb > vc > 2va
(B) 2vc > vb > va
(C) 10vb > va > vc
(D) vc > va > 4vb
(E) 2va >vb√2 > vc


http://img835.imageshack.us/img835/4352/screenshot20130127at101.png

Homework Equations


vellipse = √GM ((2/R)-(1/a))



The Attempt at a Solution


I honestly have no idea how to solve this one. With this equation, I can calculate the velocity of an elliptical orbit, but the way they worded the problem, so that it's between two points—well, that honestly has me stumped. I thought about taking the minimum and maximum values and finding a range, but the thing is, I don't know for certain what the semi major axis is.
All help on either of these is very much appreciated!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Thundagere said:
Initially, I tried adding up all the springs in the system for an equivalent spring of 210 N/m, and then solving. That didn't work and the answer was incorrect.
The behaviour of springs in series can be a bit surprising.
If you had two springs in series, each 75 N/m, that would be just the same as one spring with a constant of 75 N/m - just longer. If they undergo a total extension of x, each extends x/2, generating a force 75x/2, and adding up to 75x.

Btw, it's better to use separate threads for unrelated posts.
 
Last edited:
But aren't all these in parallel? Which two springs are in series?
 
Thundagere said:
But aren't all these in parallel? Which two springs are in series?
The two at the bottom are in parallel with each other, but as a pair they are in series with the one above.
 
Why isn't it

(1/kequivalent)=(1/75) + (1/75)
kequivalent=75/2



Isn't that the equation for springs in series?
Also, why are those in series? I was under the impression that two springs on either side of an object would be considered in parallel...could you explain when a spring is in parallel vs series for me?
 
Thundagere said:
Also, why are those in series? I was under the impression that two springs on either side of an object would be considered in parallel...could you explain when a spring is in parallel vs series for me?
If you had a mass attached to two springs, one each side, and the other ends were fixed, then that would behave as parallel. But as far as the mass on top is concerned here, they're in series. Whether they're in series or in parallel wrt the platform is a bit hard to say because neither end of the top spring is fixed. So safest is to forget about trying to classify the system this way and just work from first principles.
Create unknowns for the spring extensions and derive the force balance equations.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top