Mechanisms for multiaxis vibration

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on mechanisms for achieving multiaxis vibration testing, specifically comparing traditional uniaxial machines with advanced 6 degrees of freedom (DoF) systems. The traditional method involves using a sliding table and head expander for in-plane and out-of-plane tests, respectively. In contrast, the 6-DoF systems, potentially utilizing spherical bearings or Stewart platforms, offer a more versatile approach but raise questions about the rigidity and compliance of the joints involved. Participants are encouraged to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of both methods for effective vibration testing.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vibration testing principles
  • Familiarity with uniaxial and multiaxis shaker systems
  • Knowledge of 6 degrees of freedom (DoF) mechanics
  • Experience with Stewart platforms and their applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the design and functionality of spherical bearings in vibration systems
  • Explore the mechanics and applications of Stewart platforms in engineering
  • Investigate the advantages and limitations of 6-DoF shakers compared to traditional methods
  • Learn about the integration of flexible elements in vibration testing setups
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, vibration testing specialists, and researchers involved in mechanical testing and design who seek to enhance their understanding of multiaxis vibration testing methodologies.

Juanda
Gold Member
Messages
439
Reaction score
145
TL;DR
There are commercial shakers that claim to be able to accomplish 6-DoF, but I don't understand the underlying mechanism that makes it possible.
In vibration tests, most of my experience is working with uniaxial machines. You get results in the other directions by reorienting the test element, the machine, or both. This can be annoying at least and risky at most.
For in-plane motion, you run the test twice with a sliding table turning the test element 90 degrees, and for the out-of-plane test, you turn the shaker and install a head expander instead of a sliding table.
The following picture shows a configuration like the one I described. You can see the sliding table and the shaker oriented upwards with a head expander installed.
1746442815068.webp


There are some shakers out there that are supposed to be able to accomplish 6 degrees of freedom (DoF), but I don't understand how it's possible. I'm referring to instances like this one.
1746443040507.webp



I don't understand what's going on inside that kind of shaft boot. For the table to move in all directions, the simplest thing would be to have a flexible element joining it to the shaker, but that could go bad in many ways since it'd interact with the vibration input. So it has to be something rigid but compliant with the 6-DoF. I have been trying to understand what kind of joint would allow that, but I haven't had any luck yet. They mention spherical bearings, so maybe it's just an articulated joint under the boot, but I don't feel like that would be enough.

On the other hand, there are systems like this one, which I think I can imagine what's going on under the tarp. I have the feeling it must be a Stewart platform. I have no way to verify it, but it's how I'd try to do it, and I'd say the dimensions under the tarp check out.
1746443311188.webp




  1. Do you understand the joint used in the first 6-DoF machine?
  2. Which of the two methods do you think is preferable to get 6-DoF for testing? The traditional shaker definitely looks stronger and more solid, but the Stewart platform seems like a straightforward application of 6-DoF movement.
  3. Do you think there is a better alternative to the two options shown here?

Thanks in advance
 

Attachments

  • 1746442789029.webp
    1746442789029.webp
    22.4 KB · Views: 33

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
37K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K