Membrane Potential question: neuron function or location?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the factors influencing a neuron's membrane potential, specifically whether function or location is more critical. It highlights that while the function of a neuron involves signal integration and propagation, the location can affect extracellular ion concentrations, which are essential for determining membrane potential. The consistency of ion concentrations across the body is noted, suggesting that location may have less impact than initially thought. Different types of neurons, such as rod cells and interneurons, have distinct functions that influence their membrane properties. Ultimately, the interplay between a neuron's function and its location is crucial in understanding membrane potential.
medfourfifty
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Which of the following is NOT important in determining a neurons membrane potential:
The function of the neuron or the location of the neuron?

Homework Equations



N/a

The Attempt at a Solution


The function of a neuron is obviously the integration, summation, and propagation of signals/inofrmation. The location of a neuron will result in differing extracellular concentrations of ions, thus, should'nt a neuron's location help determine cell membrane potential?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The extracellular concentrations of ions throughout the body is pretty constant. By function of the neuron, the question means type of neuron. For example, rod cells are a type of neuron with the function of sensing photons. Other type of neuron could be interneurons or motorneurons.
 
Different types of neurons serve different purposes. Some neurons will have a longer/shorter relatively refractory period and a longer/shorter absolute refractory period, for example, which may alter a neural circuit greatly.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top