Mercury Seal Gap Size: Is it Possible?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the ability of mercury to escape through a small gap, specifically a 0.5mm opening in a container weighing about 100 grams. Participants assert that mercury's high density and low surface adhesion prevent it from seeping through small openings, unlike other liquids. The Washburn equation is referenced for calculating the largest gap size for mercury, with specific values provided for surface tension and contact angle. The conclusion emphasizes that while mercury may not escape through small gaps, it can evaporate, posing health risks.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fluid dynamics and surface tension
  • Familiarity with the Washburn equation in mercury porosimetry
  • Knowledge of mercury's physical properties, including density and surface adhesion
  • Basic concepts of rotary electrical contacts and their applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Washburn equation and its applications in fluid dynamics
  • Explore the properties of ferrofluids and their potential uses in sealing
  • Investigate the health risks associated with mercury evaporation
  • Learn about experimental setups for testing liquid behavior in small openings
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, physicists, and engineers interested in fluid dynamics, material science, and the safe handling of mercury in experimental setups.

artis
Messages
1,479
Reaction score
976
I am wondering about the physical properties of mercury. I know that different materials have different density and ability to penetrate small openings. I wonder if I have a small container of mercury, say about 100 grams or less, and there is a small flat opening at the bottom of such container which can be adjusted. Given the gap is very small (say 0.5mm) and the mercury weight not large would the mercury be able to escape through the gap?
This is more of a theoretical idea than a practical one although if such gap could be made and sealed with some lubricant it could come in handy as a rotary electrical contact for some of my experiments later on which is partly why I'm asking.

I have a feeling that unlike water or diesel or other liquids that can easily seep through very small opening mercury's high density and very low surface adhesion and wetting would prevent it from seeping through a small opening in liquid form.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It wouldn't drop down if you don't shake the container but it will still evaporate at the surface, making that a health risk.
 
Well in theory the atmospheric end of the small opening could be sealed off by ferrofluid or a similar material.
I wonder is there any way of determining what is the largest gap size for any given weight and shape of container of mercury?
 
Sure. Simulate it. Or try to find an analytic expression for the total energy and look if it has a minimum.
 
I meant calculating the gap size, but I assume that would be complicated.
 
The Washburn equation is used in mercury porosimetry:
ΔPr = -2γcosθ
where ΔP is the pressure difference (usually just the pressure, as the sample is evacuated); r is the pore radius, γ is the surface tension of mercury and θ is the contact angle of the mercury with the solid. Using typical values of 140° for θ and 0.480 N/m for γ, we obtain
r = 0.736/ΔP
where r is in µm and ΔP in MPa
If r = 250 µm, ΔP = 2.9 kPa, corresponding to a mercury column of ca. 22 mm. A mercury layer deeper than this would go through the pores under its own weight.
 
  • Like
Likes Nik_2213 and mfb

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K