Meteorite heading towards earth

  • Thread starter Thread starter josephcollins
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Meteorite
AI Thread Summary
A meteorite with an initial velocity of 2.00*10^4 m/s is calculated to collide with Earth at a final velocity of 2.15*10^4 m/s, based on energy conservation principles. There is a debate about the correctness of dividing by 2 in the energy equations, with some arguing that the change in potential energy should be considered differently. The discussion also touches on the terminology surrounding meteoroids and meteorites, clarifying that a meteoroid becomes a meteor when it enters the atmosphere. Concerns are raised about the potential for high-velocity impacts, suggesting that significant warning time is typically expected for large objects. The conversation highlights the complexities of calculating impact velocities and the implications of high-speed collisions with Earth.
josephcollins
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
Hi ppl. I have a short question. A meteorite of mass m has a velocity u=2.00*10^4 m/s when it is at an infinite distance from the earth. It eventually collides with the eath with a velocity v. Calculate v. given are the radius of earth(6.37*10^6m) and go=9.80Nkg^-1)

I used the argument that the change in kinetic energy is going to be equal to 0.5m(v^2-u^2) which also equals GMem/2Re which resolves to goRem/2. Equating and calculating gives 2.15*10^4m/s. Could someone verify that this is correct and that potential energy or total energy is not neglected in my reasoning? thanks, joe
 
Physics news on Phys.org
josephcollins said:
I used the argument that the change in kinetic energy is going to be equal to 0.5m(v^2-u^2) which also equals GMem/2Re which resolves to goRem/2.
I don't see why you divided by 2. (The change in PE should equal g R_e m)
 
Last edited:
Wow! That meteorite had quite the bounce to it to achieve that high and fast of an arc, don't you think?

Or perhaps your prof meant meteor?

;)
 
I'll bet the prof meant meteoroid on its way to becoming a meteorite. (If the meteoroid burns up--becoming a "shooting star"--then it would be a meteor.)

Regardless, that's one heck of a meteoroid to make it through the atmosphere with no apparent loss of mass. :smile:
 
Most scenarios seem to imply that massive objects hitting our planet would be traveling at a speed that would give days if not weeks of warning.

Is there any reason that a meteor should not hit the Earth at a very high relative velocity? Even one traveling at 80% the speed of light would be difficult to see coming, and hence be something of a surprise!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top