Method of images with infinite, earthed, conducting plane

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The method of images is a technique used to solve electrostatic problems involving conductors. In this discussion, a charge +q located at (0,0,a) above a grounded conducting plane is replaced by a mirror charge -q at (0,0,-a), satisfying boundary conditions as per the uniqueness theorem. The potential on the surface of the plane is zero, while the electric field just above the plane is given by the formula q/(2πε₀a²), indicating the induced surface charge. The potential between the two charges is non-zero, as potential is a scalar quantity and does not cancel out between unlike charges.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatics and electric fields
  • Familiarity with the method of images in electrostatics
  • Knowledge of boundary conditions in electrostatic problems
  • Basic concepts of electric potential and field lines
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the uniqueness theorem in electrostatics
  • Learn about the implications of the method of images for different charge configurations
  • Explore the concept of electric potential and its scalar nature
  • Investigate induced surface charges on conductors in electrostatic equilibrium
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on electrostatics, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in solving problems involving conducting planes and charge distributions.

watty
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hello guys,

I'm having some trouble getting my head around the method of images, partly due to confusing notes and things.

If I have a charge +q at a fixed point (0,0,a) above a conducting plane that is held at zero potential, it is said that the plane can be replaced with a charge of -q at (0,0,-a) as this solution satisfies the same boundary conditions (as per the uniqueness theorem).

How is it that the potential on the surface of the plane can be 0 but the electric field be described as q/(2pi x espilon_0 x a^2)?

I would have thought the potential be non-zero in the case of the mirror charge. Can the two charges not be thought of as a dipole? As in their field lines are both going in the same direction. Only if both charges were the +q or both -q would the potential, in my mind at least, be zero midway between them.

Any help would be greatly appreciated,

watty
 
Physics news on Phys.org
watty said:
How is it that the potential on the surface of the plane can be 0 but the electric field be described as q/(2pi x espilon_0 x a^2)?
Note that this is the field immediately above the plane, due to the induced surface charge.

I would have thought the potential be non-zero in the case of the mirror charge. Can the two charges not be thought of as a dipole? As in their field lines are both going in the same direction.
Yes, the charge and the mirror charge form a dipole, and their field lines do go in the same direction at the plane.
Only if both charges were the +q or both -q would the potential, in my mind at least, be zero midway between them.
The potential midway between two like charges is not zero. Recall that potential is a scalar--the potential from each charge is the same, thus the potential midway is non-zero. (Only for unlike charges would the potential contributions cancel at the midway point.)

Here's a clear discussion of the method of image charges that might help you: http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/em/lectures/node64.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
945
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K