Method of Moments Estimation for Rectangular Distribution

  • Thread starter Thread starter grimster
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Method Moments
grimster
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
ok, X_1,X_2,...,X_n are independant(and unbiased) rectangular distributed random variables over the interval [0,a]

It is known that T(X)=max(X_1,X_2,...,X_n) is sufficient. i am supposed to find the moment estimator for a using the method of moments.

i know I'm supposed to equate the first k sample moments to the corresponding k population moments and solve the resulting system of equations, but i have a few questions:

1.is the rectangular distribution the same as the uniform distribution?

2.to get me started so i understand what to do, what is the first sample and population moment?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
something like this:
sample moment = the population moment:
x_bar=a/2 -> a=2*x_bar
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top