Metric variation of the covariant derivative

Theo1808
Messages
1
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Hi all, I currently have a modified Einstein-Hilbert action, with extra terms coming from some vector field A_\mu = (A_0(t),0,0,0), given by

\mathcal{L}_A = -\frac{1}{2} \nabla _\mu A_\nu \nabla ^\mu A ^\nu +\frac{1}{2} R_{\mu \nu} A^\mu A^\nu.

The resulting field equation has been given as R_{\mu \nu} - \frac{1}{2} R g_{\mu \nu} = 8 \pi G (T_{\mu \nu} + T^A _{\mu \nu}) i.e. the same as Einstein's equation but with an extra energy-momentum term coming from A_\mu. I'm trying to find the form of T^A _{\mu \nu} and I only know that the density associated with it (I assume T^A _{00}) is \rho_A = \frac{3}{2}H^2A_0^2+3HA_0 \dot{A}_0 - \frac{1}{2} \dot{A}^2 _0. (The metric used is FRW ds^2 = dt^2 - a^2(t) \delta_{ij}dx^idx^j).

Homework Equations



Searching around has found these (I think) useful relations: \frac{\delta g_{\mu \nu}}{\delta g^{\rho \sigma}} = -g_{\mu \rho}g_{\nu \sigma}, \frac{A^\mu}{\delta g^{\rho \sigma}} = 0 and \frac{A_\mu}{\delta g^{\rho \sigma}} = -g_{\mu \rho}A_\sigma

The Attempt at a Solution



So my problem is getting a analytical equation for variations in the covariant derivative. I can rewrite R_{\mu \nu} A^\mu A^\nu as \nabla _\mu A^\mu \nabla _\nu A^\nu - \nabla _\mu A^\nu \nabla _\nu A^\mu, so everything is in terms of covariant derivatives. The problem arises with variations in the Christoffel symbols. This gives me terms that are derivatives of \delta g_{\mu \nu}, which I'm not sure how to deal with (ultimately I'd want some expression all multiplied by \delta g^{\rho \sigma}. In the original EH action for example the variations in the connections are in a total derivative so they aren't needed to be evaluated. I tried to see what would happen if I ignored variations in the connection and with T^A _{\mu \nu} = - 2 \frac{\delta \mathcal{L}}{\delta g^{\rho \sigma}} + g_{\rho \sigma}\mathcal{L}, which gave me some of the terms in the density, but ultimately I believe I'm missing extra terms. Ignoring the variations in the connection, I get

T^A _{\rho \sigma} = \nabla_\rho A_\nu \nabla_\sigma A^\nu - g^{\mu \beta}\nabla_\mu A_\rho \nabla_\beta A_\sigma -\frac{1}{2} g_{\rho \sigma} g^{\alpha \mu} \nabla _\mu A_\nu \nabla _\alpha A ^\nu +\frac{1}{2} g_{\rho \sigma} R_{\mu \nu} A^\mu A^\nu.

The R_{\mu \nu} A^\mu A^\nu term gives me (finding the (00) term in T) a -\frac{3}{2}(\dot{H} + H^2)A_0^2 term. I also get that the first 2 terms in T_{00}, after using the substitution of connections in FRW, all cancel out or go to zero. While the third term gives me the -\frac{1}{2} \dot{A}^2 _0 and +\frac{3}{2}H^2A_0^2. The problem is then I'm missing a few terms which I think come from me ignoring variations in the connection.

Thanks for any help you might be able to give me.
 
  • Like
Likes demon
If I am understanding you, you arrive at terms like ∂(δgμν) and you don't know how to factor it in terms of δgμν, is that right?

If so, I recently arrived to the same problem through a different action. Sadly I haven't found an answer yet, so I'll be watching this space... Also, if I find an answer I'll post it here.

By the way, would you mind letting me know where you found the relation
δgμν/δgρσ=−gμρgνσ

Thanks in advance
 
demon said:
By the way, would you mind letting me know where you found the relation
δgμν/δgρσ=−gμρgνσ

Please forget this last point, I got confused with δ and ∂ again...
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top