Metricity Equation: ∇_{μ}g_{αβ}=0, ∇_{μ}g^αβ ≠ 0?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kuecken
  • Start date Start date
kuecken
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
∇_{\mu}g_{\alpha\beta}=0 is the metricity equation (∇ the covariant derivative).
However, I wondered whether also ∇_{\mu}g^{\alpha\beta}=0 holds?
When I checked it, it did not. But I really want it to hold, so I was wondering whether I made a mistake.
Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi kuecken. In fact ##\nabla_{\mu}g_{\alpha\beta} = 0 \Leftrightarrow \nabla_{\mu}g^{\alpha\beta} = 0##.

This is actually very easy to see:

##0 = \nabla_{\mu}\delta^{\alpha}{}{}_{\beta} = \nabla_{\mu}(g^{\alpha \gamma}g_{\gamma \beta}) = g^{\alpha\gamma}\nabla_{\mu}g_{\gamma \beta} + g_{\gamma\beta}\nabla_{\mu}g^{\alpha \gamma}## holds identically hence if ##\nabla_{\mu}g_{\alpha\beta} = 0## then ##\nabla_{\mu}g^{\alpha\beta} = 0## and similarly for the converse.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
This is the expression I arrived at. However, can I argue that the g_{\gamma\beta} in front of ∇ is arbitrary? Or how do I do that last step
 
So we have ##g_{\gamma\beta}\nabla_{\mu}g^{\alpha\gamma} = 0##. Contract both sides with ##g^{\nu\beta}## to get ##\delta^{\nu}{}{}_{\gamma}\nabla_{\mu}g^{\alpha\gamma} = \nabla_{\mu}g^{\alpha\nu} = 0##.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Because of the metricity condition, one can define the so-called contravariant derivatives:

\nabla^{\mu}T_{\alpha} = g^{\mu\nu} \nabla_{\nu}T_{\alpha}

= \nabla_{\nu}\left(g^{\mu\nu}T_{\alpha}\right)

that is freely take out and put back the metric tensor under the covariant/contravariant differentiation sign.
 
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top