What is the principle behind Michelson interferometer?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Physicsissuef
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Michelson
Physicsissuef
Messages
908
Reaction score
0
Hello people!

I got big problem.

l=\frac{ct_n}{2} - the light in one way.

Here are the pictures, I think you'll see what I am talking about.

http://img218.imageshack.us/my.php?image=picture001id5.jpg

http://img135.imageshack.us/my.php?image=picture002tx5.jpg

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e7/Interferometer.svg

Please help!

Thank you!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Physicsissuef said:
l=\frac{ct_n}{2} - the light in one way.

This equations says (apparently) that light travels a distance 2l. A-to-M2, and M2-to-A1, are each a distance l.
Perhaps they are assuming very small angles, so that M2-to-B is approximately l also. You're right, they can't all be exactly equal to l.
 
Why they aren't using Pitagorean theorem? If they use Pitagorean theorem, "x" or "l" (as they say) would be \frac{t_nc\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}{2}, right?
 
Physicsissuef said:
Why they aren't using Pitagorean theorem? If they use Pitagorean theorem, "x" or "l" (as they say) would be \frac{t_nc\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}{2}, right?

Rearrange your expression

l = \frac{t_nc\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}{2} \quad _{(1)}

to get

t_n = \frac{2l}{c}\left(1-\frac{v^2}{c^2} \right)^{-1/2} \quad _{(2)}

then that is exactly what I see in the photographed text at the bottom of the your first image.
 
Last edited:
Also: the red "l"s in the first image are incorrect. Those distances are greater than l.

edit:
This contradicts my earlier post. I've since realized that the figure is in the reference frame of the "ether", in which those distances (A-to-M1) are greater than l. They are equal to l in the lab reference frame only.
 
Last edited:
I think the second picture is where the Michelson interferometer is in the ether. So the real distances are "l", but when the Michelson interferometer is on the earth, also there is effect from the ground, and the light "turns" by some angle, so those "l"-s on the first pictures are actually greater then "l", and the normal distance is "l".
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top