Microbiology: Why Does 70% EtOH Work Better Than 100%?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gochi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Microbiology Work
AI Thread Summary
Discussions on the effectiveness of disinfectants reveal that certain concentrations, particularly 70% ethanol (EtOH), are more effective than 100% EtOH for microbial disinfection. The primary reason is that 70% EtOH penetrates microbial cells better due to its water content, which allows for protein unfolding and cell damage rather than just dehydration. Pure ethanol evaporates too quickly, limiting its contact time and effectiveness. The optimal balance of alcohol and water facilitates absorption into the cell, leading to cytoplasmic leakage and cell lysis. This principle also applies to isopropyl alcohol, with many industries using a 60% concentration for disinfection. The discussion highlights the importance of concentration, evaporation rates, and contact time in the efficacy of disinfectants.
gochi
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
yea so some disinfectants work better at certain concentrations such as 70% etoh as opposed to 100% etoh.

what is the reason for this?

this is a question pertaining to microbiology btw.

thanks.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
it's assumed to penetrate better into the microbial cel. Not aware of data to this point tho have seen data showing faster kill
 
It takes longer to evaporate, allowing you to cover surfaces more effectively. 70% still evaporates fast as lightning, but it's more manageable.
 
I've also heard what JorgeLobo and kingdomof mention, that it takes longer to evaporate and is thus more effective at penetrating, dehydrating, and killing microbes.
 
You want to unfold a protein and not just dehydrate it. 95% EtOH quickly dehydrates the cell, after which the microbes can be brought back to life by re-hydration. 70% EtOH contains enough water so that dehydration is not efficient, now the protein is allowed to enter the cell and unfold proteins by the action of EtOH, this is very damaging to the microbes.
 
Last edited:
Monique said:
The main reason is that you want to unfold a protein and not just dehydrate it.

100% EtOH acts by dehydrating the cell, after which the microbes and their spores can be brought back to life by re-hydration.

70% EtOH contains enough water so that dehydration is not efficient, now the protein is allowed to unfold by the action of EtOH and this is very damaging to the microbes and their spores.

It's actually difficult to find definitive information about this question. Ultimately it's all about contact time. Pure ethanol evaporates too quickly to be effective for the reasons explained by Monique. So all above answers are correct.
 
This is the answer a similar question received in the Pharmaceutical Microbiology forum:

It is because alcohols become more efficient in two ways:

a) By the molecular weight (hence ethanol is more effective than
methanol);
b) the way by which alcohols destroy vegetative cells is by the
absorption
into the cell (which then causes cytoplasm leakage, denaturation of
protein and eventually cell lysis - a combination of effects sometimes
described
as membrane disruption). To be readily absorbed into the cell water is
needed.
Thus an optimal balance between the concentration of alcohol in order to
kill the cell and sufficient water to be absorbed is required. This
Comes out at around 70%. With 95% alcohol there is not sufficient water for
the bacterial cell membrane to signal that the unknown liquid can be
absorbed.

For more information, the following chapter may be of interest:

Sandle, T.: ‘Selection and use of cleaning and disinfection agents in
pharmaceutical manufacturing’ in Hodges, N and Hanlon, G. (2003;
updated 2008): ‘Industrial Pharmaceutical Microbiology Standards and
Controls’, Euromed Communications, England
 
You'd really have to say 95% EtOH rather than 100%. That's the azeotrope.
 
Does the disinfectant quality extend to isopropyl and water in the same fashion? I use 50:50 water and 90% Iso as a general-purpose cleaner/disinfectant around the house.
 
  • #10
turbo-1 said:
Does the disinfectant quality extend to isopropyl and water in the same fashion? I use 50:50 water and 90% Iso as a general-purpose cleaner/disinfectant around the house.

Most industries and hospitals use isopropanol at 60%. This is sometimes supplemented by caustic (NaOH) or peroxide.
 
  • #11
I got into the habit of using that mix when I was a dispensing optician. It was wonderful for cleaning lenses before and after edging the and assembling the glasses. It is a cheap no-streak cleaner for windows and mirrors, and we use it to clean countertops, especially after handling poultry.
 
Back
Top