Concerns About Airborne Microplastics: Causes & Effects

  • Thread starter Thread starter kenny1999
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Microplastics can potentially be inhaled from indoor air, particularly due to the prevalence of plastic products in homes. The discussion highlights that while microplastics are present, their concentration in indoor air may be influenced more by clothing and textiles, which often contain synthetic fibers, rather than just plastic household items. The formation of airborne microplastics can occur from both new products and those that experience wear and environmental stress over time. Concerns are raised about the health implications of microplastics, especially nanoplastics, which may have increased bioavailability and the ability to cross biological barriers, such as cell membranes and the blood-brain barrier. Reliable sources discussing the environmental impact and health risks of microplastics are sought, with references to primary and secondary pollutants provided for context.
kenny1999
Messages
235
Reaction score
5
I have read some articles about microplastics, which state that we could breathe in microplastics from the indoor air.

Generally speaking, if we have more home products made of plastics (of any common types), are
we breathing in more microplastic every day?

By the way, how is airborne microplastic formed? Is it that any plastics products would naturally release microplastic from its surface on day 1 or did they only release microplastics when they are stressed by horrible environment or wear from long-term use?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
kenny1999 said:
I have read some articles about microplastics, which state that we could breathe in microplastics from the indoor air.
Could you provide some links to your reading? Preferably from reputable medical websites. Thanks. :smile:
 
kenny1999 said:
I have read some articles about microplastics, which state that we could breathe in microplastics from the indoor air.
Sure.

kenny1999 said:
Generally speaking, if we have more home products made of plastics (of any common types), are
we breathing in more microplastic every day?
It is more related to clothing and such: also, contains both natural plastic-like materials like cotton or wool and artificial fibers.

The problem is, that so far I could not find any reliable source that the harm it can do would be related to plastics instead of the well known troubles coming from the 'dusty' air.
 
Last edited:
Here is an explanation about primary and secondary pollutants.
http://www.differencebetween.net/sc...-primary-pollutants-and-secondary-pollutants/

1. microplastics are not that common but fall under the particulates class in the link above for primary pollutants

2. Secondary pollutants form faster in the presense of particulates. Small amounts of very tiny particles of any (somwhat) inert sort, kind of act like a platform to aggregate other particles of nasty molecules. These new pollutants are secondary pollutants and are sometimes labelled SAO's. Example: This can happen in your kitchen. Like the smoke from very overheated smoking oil that ends up forming goo on the walls, mixed with the aerosols from frying.

Here is a discussion of why smoking oil (oil above the smoke point) occurs.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smoke_point
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara
Deadly cattle screwworm parasite found in US patient. What to know. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2025/08/25/new-world-screwworm-human-case/85813010007/ Exclusive: U.S. confirms nation's first travel-associated human screwworm case connected to Central American outbreak https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-confirms-nations-first-travel-associated-human-screwworm-case-connected-2025-08-25/...
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...

Similar threads

Replies
33
Views
7K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
36
Views
7K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top