Microwave ovens vs. cordless phones

  • Thread starter Thread starter overlook1977
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Microwave
AI Thread Summary
Microwave ovens and 2.4 GHz cordless phones operate on the same frequency, but their power levels differ significantly, with microwaves using up to 1000 W compared to the 100 mW of cordless phones. This substantial difference in power output explains why cordless phones do not heat the body like microwave ovens do. The intensity of the waves, rather than their frequency, determines their heating effect on water molecules. Regulatory agencies impose limits on RF energy exposure, measured as specific absorption rate (SAR), to ensure safety. Manufacturers mitigate exposure by using low-power transmitters and positioning antennas away from the user's head.
overlook1977
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
If a microwave oven is using the same frequency as a 2.4 GHz cordless phone, why is it that a cordless phone does not heat your body when you use it? I am assuming it has something to do with concentration or focus of the waves? I would assume a cordless phone or anything that emits waves in this frequency would have to have some measurable effect on water molecules in its proximity, am I correct?
 
Science news on Phys.org
It's simply the amount of power being used. Microwave ovens use up to 1000 W, while cordless phones and cell phones use powers on the order of 100 mW.
 
do you know if a cordless phone or other 2.4 GHz wireless device can make a measurable difference in nearby water temperature (however small)?
 
Depends how good your measurement is (and how well insulated the water is) !

1mW into a glass (100cc) of water, would heat it by 8.5mK in 1 hour assuming no heat was lost.
 
Makes sense...I was forgetting about wave intensity. Thanks!
 
The various regulatory agencies limit the amount of RF energy that is allowed to be deposited by a device. The limit of interest is called SAR (specific absorption rate) and is in units of W/kg. I don't know what the limit is for cordless phones, but manufacturers generally do two things to reduce it. First, they use low-power transmitters. Second, they position the antenna as far away from the head as they reasonably can.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top