Miller index planes and directions relationship

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between Miller index planes and directions, specifically whether the direction is normal to the plane. Participants agree that the direction appears to be perpendicular to the plane but express uncertainty about how to mathematically prove this relationship. There is a consensus that while mathematical proof might not be strictly necessary, a solid conceptual understanding is important for academic credit. The course is identified as an upper-level engineering class with significant expectations for students. Overall, the focus is on understanding the geometric relationship between Miller indices in materials science.
cameuth
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


do you notice a relationship between the plane and directions of the same miller index? what is it?


Homework Equations



I've done planes and directions (111), [111], (112), and [112]

The Attempt at a Solution


I believe the direction is normal to the plane on first glance, but I can't seem to do the math to prove it. first off, am I right that the direction is perpendicular and second, how would I begin to prove this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yea the direction does appear to be perpendicular to the plane.
are you sure you need to prove it using math?
 
I suppose I wouldn't have to prove it using math, but I do feel like I need some reason other than "they look perpendicular". I guess the reasoning behind why this happens is what I'm after.
 
the way the question is worded implies you probably don't need to show using math.

is this an intro to materials class? or upper div?
 
It's an upper level engineering class, but it's also a basic materials class. Basically, a lot is expected of us, so I want to be sure that I'm not missing some simple proof. If that were the case, I'd receive little to no credit for my answer.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top