Miniature nuclear reactor as a project?

  • Thread starter Karthikthe
  • Start date
i have desided to make a miniature nuclear reactor as my science project .i beg the helps from all physicsforum members..........
 

cristo

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
8,056
72
I remember seeing a thread like this before. The conclusion made then was that it is not safe for a student to make a nuclear reactor. Perhaps you should look at making something else for your science project.
 

Morbius

Science Advisor
Dearly Missed
1,125
5
i have desided to make a miniature nuclear reactor as my science project .i beg the helps from all physicsforum members..........
Karthikthe,

FORGET IT!!!

A true critical nuclear reactor is INAPPROPRIATE as a science project.

It's beyond the technical competence of someone doing science projects, it's not safe
without the requisite expertise, it's too expensive and it's ILLEGAL!!!

Dr. Gregory Greenman
Physicist
 

vanesch

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
5,007
16
This discussion is hilarious !
 
54
0
Hopefully, you ain't trying anything with uranium-238 or thorium.

I really don't know if this could be possible, but you could try americium that you can find from smoke detectors. I believe over some 70 years or so, it turns useless for your purpose as it decays into neptunium. Moral? Buy new smoke alarms! (Well, I don't think there were smoke alarms back in 1940. If there were, they're going to be rare out now)

As for the "americium reactor" (no naming credits accepted), you can try bombarding the electrons onto the americium using a cathode ray tube (silly idea, I must say. But you never know, it just might work).

Let's see if anyone can rectify this post (if wrong, of course) and discuss the "reactor".
 

Astronuc

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
18,547
1,682
The first artificial, self-sustaining, nuclear chain reaction was initiated within CP-1, on December 2, 1942.

Americium was first obtained in 1944 by Seaborg et al who were bombarding plutonium with neutrons. Neptunium and plutonium were discovered in 1940, and curium was discovered in 1944 shortly before americium was confirmed.

The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1951 was awarded jointly to Edwin Mattison McMillan and Glenn Theodore Seaborg "for their discoveries in the chemistry of the transuranium elements"
http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/chemistry/laureates/1951/index.html
http://www.osti.gov/cgi-bin/rd_accomplishments/display_biblio.cgi?id=ACC0048&numPages=42&fp=N

The New Element Americium (Atomic Number 95)
http://www.osti.gov/cgi-bin/rd_accomplishments/display_biblio.cgi?id=ACC0046&numPages=43&fp=N

The New Element Curium (Atomic Number 96)
http://www.osti.gov/cgi-bin/rd_accomplishments/display_biblio.cgi?id=ACC0049&numPages=13&fp=N

http://isswprod.lbl.gov/Seaborg/bio.htm [Broken]

There is no need to discuss reactor concepts that students can build. There are other appropriate threads in which to discuss reactor technology. Thread locked.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Related Threads for: Miniature nuclear reactor as a project?

  • Posted
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Posted
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • Posted
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • Posted
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Posted
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • Posted
Replies
10
Views
3K

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving
Top