Miniature nuclear reactor as a project?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the inappropriateness of constructing a miniature nuclear reactor as a science project. Experts, including physicist Dr. Gregory Greenman, emphasize that such a project is unsafe, illegal, and beyond the technical competence of students. Alternatives to nuclear reactors are recommended, highlighting the importance of using safe and legal materials for educational projects. The conversation references historical nuclear milestones, including the first artificial nuclear chain reaction in 1942 and the discovery of americium in 1944.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nuclear physics principles
  • Knowledge of legal regulations regarding radioactive materials
  • Familiarity with safe science project guidelines
  • Basic chemistry knowledge, particularly regarding transuranium elements
NEXT STEPS
  • Research safe science project alternatives for high school students
  • Learn about the properties and applications of americium
  • Study the history and significance of the CP-1 nuclear reactor
  • Explore legal regulations surrounding the use of radioactive materials in educational settings
USEFUL FOR

Students, educators, and science project coordinators seeking safe and legal project ideas, as well as those interested in the history of nuclear science and its applications.

Karthikthe
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
i have desided to make a miniature nuclear reactor as my science project .i beg the helps from all physicsforum members...
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I remember seeing a thread like this before. The conclusion made then was that it is not safe for a student to make a nuclear reactor. Perhaps you should look at making something else for your science project.
 
Karthikthe said:
i have desided to make a miniature nuclear reactor as my science project .i beg the helps from all physicsforum members...
Karthikthe,

FORGET IT!

A true critical nuclear reactor is INAPPROPRIATE as a science project.

It's beyond the technical competence of someone doing science projects, it's not safe
without the requisite expertise, it's too expensive and it's ILLEGAL!

Dr. Gregory Greenman
Physicist
 
This discussion is hilarious !
 
Hopefully, you ain't trying anything with uranium-238 or thorium.

I really don't know if this could be possible, but you could try americium that you can find from smoke detectors. I believe over some 70 years or so, it turns useless for your purpose as it decays into neptunium. Moral? Buy new smoke alarms! (Well, I don't think there were smoke alarms back in 1940. If there were, they're going to be rare out now)

As for the "americium reactor" (no naming credits accepted), you can try bombarding the electrons onto the americium using a cathode ray tube (silly idea, I must say. But you never know, it just might work).

Let's see if anyone can rectify this post (if wrong, of course) and discuss the "reactor".
 
The first artificial, self-sustaining, nuclear chain reaction was initiated within CP-1, on December 2, 1942.

Americium was first obtained in 1944 by Seaborg et al who were bombarding plutonium with neutrons. Neptunium and plutonium were discovered in 1940, and curium was discovered in 1944 shortly before americium was confirmed.

The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1951 was awarded jointly to Edwin Mattison McMillan and Glenn Theodore Seaborg "for their discoveries in the chemistry of the transuranium elements"
http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/chemistry/laureates/1951/index.html
http://www.osti.gov/cgi-bin/rd_accomplishments/display_biblio.cgi?id=ACC0048&numPages=42&fp=N

The New Element Americium (Atomic Number 95)
http://www.osti.gov/cgi-bin/rd_accomplishments/display_biblio.cgi?id=ACC0046&numPages=43&fp=N

The New Element Curium (Atomic Number 96)
http://www.osti.gov/cgi-bin/rd_accomplishments/display_biblio.cgi?id=ACC0049&numPages=13&fp=N

http://isswprod.lbl.gov/Seaborg/bio.htm

There is no need to discuss reactor concepts that students can build. There are other appropriate threads in which to discuss reactor technology. Thread locked.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
45
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K