Miniature nuclear reactor as a project?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the feasibility and safety of constructing a miniature nuclear reactor as a science project. Participants explore the implications of such a project, including safety concerns, legality, and technical challenges, while also referencing historical context and alternative materials.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a desire to build a miniature nuclear reactor for a science project and seeks assistance from the forum members.
  • Another participant recalls a previous discussion concluding that building a nuclear reactor is unsafe for students and suggests choosing a different project.
  • A third participant strongly advises against the project, stating it is inappropriate due to safety, technical complexity, cost, and legality concerns.
  • Some participants humorously comment on the discussion's nature, indicating a mix of skepticism and disbelief regarding the project idea.
  • One participant speculates about using americium from smoke detectors, suggesting a method involving cathode ray tubes, while acknowledging the idea's silliness and inviting corrections.
  • Another participant provides historical context about the first artificial nuclear chain reaction and the discovery of americium, emphasizing that discussions about reactor concepts suitable for students are unnecessary.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the appropriateness and safety of constructing a miniature nuclear reactor, with some advocating against it due to various concerns, while others explore speculative ideas related to the project.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations regarding safety regulations, legal restrictions on materials, and the technical expertise required for nuclear projects, which remain unresolved.

Karthikthe
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
i have desided to make a miniature nuclear reactor as my science project .i beg the helps from all physicsforum members...
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I remember seeing a thread like this before. The conclusion made then was that it is not safe for a student to make a nuclear reactor. Perhaps you should look at making something else for your science project.
 
Karthikthe said:
i have desided to make a miniature nuclear reactor as my science project .i beg the helps from all physicsforum members...
Karthikthe,

FORGET IT!

A true critical nuclear reactor is INAPPROPRIATE as a science project.

It's beyond the technical competence of someone doing science projects, it's not safe
without the requisite expertise, it's too expensive and it's ILLEGAL!

Dr. Gregory Greenman
Physicist
 
This discussion is hilarious !
 
Hopefully, you ain't trying anything with uranium-238 or thorium.

I really don't know if this could be possible, but you could try americium that you can find from smoke detectors. I believe over some 70 years or so, it turns useless for your purpose as it decays into neptunium. Moral? Buy new smoke alarms! (Well, I don't think there were smoke alarms back in 1940. If there were, they're going to be rare out now)

As for the "americium reactor" (no naming credits accepted), you can try bombarding the electrons onto the americium using a cathode ray tube (silly idea, I must say. But you never know, it just might work).

Let's see if anyone can rectify this post (if wrong, of course) and discuss the "reactor".
 
The first artificial, self-sustaining, nuclear chain reaction was initiated within CP-1, on December 2, 1942.

Americium was first obtained in 1944 by Seaborg et al who were bombarding plutonium with neutrons. Neptunium and plutonium were discovered in 1940, and curium was discovered in 1944 shortly before americium was confirmed.

The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1951 was awarded jointly to Edwin Mattison McMillan and Glenn Theodore Seaborg "for their discoveries in the chemistry of the transuranium elements"
http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/chemistry/laureates/1951/index.html
http://www.osti.gov/cgi-bin/rd_accomplishments/display_biblio.cgi?id=ACC0048&numPages=42&fp=N

The New Element Americium (Atomic Number 95)
http://www.osti.gov/cgi-bin/rd_accomplishments/display_biblio.cgi?id=ACC0046&numPages=43&fp=N

The New Element Curium (Atomic Number 96)
http://www.osti.gov/cgi-bin/rd_accomplishments/display_biblio.cgi?id=ACC0049&numPages=13&fp=N

http://isswprod.lbl.gov/Seaborg/bio.htm

There is no need to discuss reactor concepts that students can build. There are other appropriate threads in which to discuss reactor technology. Thread locked.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
45
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K