Minimal coupling of a Field with electromagnetism

Jesus
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I have some doubts about minimal coupling of a field of spin 2 for example, with the electromagnetism and I hope someone can help me to clarify them.

According to Pauli and Fierz one couples the field with electromagnetism introducing the covariant derivative at the level of the Lagrangian, but, does the field need to be complexified in the lagrangian in order to maintain the same degrees of freedom than before we turn on the electromagnetic interaction?

At least that is what I have seen in the literature but I don't have clear why complexify the field.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, you have two different problems: 1. Coupling of gravity with electromagnetism in the absence of (presumably electrically charged) matter. 2. Coupling of electromagnetism to electrically charged matter in the presence of gravity.

2. Electromagnetism is a linear U(1) gauge theory. It's necessary for the matter field to be either complex-valued (thus at least 2 types of fields) or more generally with values in a Z2-graded algebra (= involuted algebra), else the coupling will not occur. So indeed there are particular requirements on the matter fields before trying to see how they couple to an e-m field. Gravity couples to both the e-m field and to matter. There's no requirement on the matter field coming from the gravity sector.
1. Electromagnetism couples to gravity automatically if you write down the former's Lagrangian action in a curved space-time. The metric enters in a nice way (through F2) and in a pesky way through √-g. For details, see the wonderful <80 p. brochure on General Relativity by Dirac.
 
  • Like
Likes Jesus
Jesus said:
I have some doubts about minimal coupling of a field of spin 2 for example, with the electromagnetism and I hope someone can help me to clarify them.

According to Pauli and Fierz one couples the field with electromagnetism introducing the covariant derivative at the level of the Lagrangian, but, does the field need to be complexified in the lagrangian in order to maintain the same degrees of freedom than before we turn on the electromagnetic interaction?

At least that is what I have seen in the literature but I don't have clear why complexify the field.

Thank you.

Recall the interaction Lagrangian \mathcal{L} = A_{\mu} J^{\mu}.
1) What is J^{\mu}?
2) If the matter field (of any spin) is real, does J^{\mu} exist?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...

Similar threads

Back
Top