A Minimal Covering Set: System of Distinct Representatives

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter WWGD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set
WWGD
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
7,679
Reaction score
12,405
Hi All,
Let ##s: \{s_1,s_2,...,s_j \}## be a collection of elements contained in the sets ##S:=\{S_1,S_2,...S_k \}## , no relation between ##j,k##; a given ##s_i## may be contained in one or more ##S_n##. I want to find a minimal "cover" for ##s##, i.e., the smallest subcollection of sets in ##S## that contains every element in ##s##. I think this is called an SDR : System of Distinct Representatives.
Is there a general formula dealing with this? Obviously, ##k## is an upper bound.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top