Minimize Cost of Norman Window: Area Ratio of h/r

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves optimizing the cost of constructing a Norman window, which consists of a rectangular section topped with a semicircular section. The challenge is to determine the ratio of height to radius that minimizes the cost, given that the semicircular portion is more expensive to build than the straight edges.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the correct formulation of the area and perimeter equations for the Norman window, questioning the cost implications of the semicircular portion. There is exploration of how to set up the cost function based on the given area.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, sharing their attempts at deriving equations and expressing confusion about certain aspects, such as the role of the cost variable. Some have provided insights into how to approach the derivative and the implications of the cost variable in the equations.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted lack of clarity regarding the cost per unit length of the window, which is not specified in the problem. Participants are also navigating the algebra involved in simplifying expressions related to height and radius.

fghtffyrdmns
Messages
145
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A Norman window has the shape of a rectangle with a semicircular top. Assume that the semicircular portion of the peripmeter is three times as costly to build per metre as the straight edges. For a given area, what ratio of heigh to radius would minimize the cost.

Homework Equations



A diagram. r is radius, h is height.

The Attempt at a Solution



P = (\pi r)+ 2r+ h + h

I'm not sure if this is right. It is asking for area so I should use S.A = (\pi r^2)/2 + 2rh?

I'm just having trouble setting up the equation.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi fghtffyrdmns! :smile:

(have a pi: π and try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)
fghtffyrdmns said:
A Norman window has the shape of a rectangle with a semicircular top. Assume that the semicircular portion of the peripmeter is three times as costly to build per metre as the straight edges. For a given area, what ratio of heigh to radius would minimize the cost.

πr2/2 + 2rh is correct for the area.

But when they say "as costly to build per metre", I think they mean you have to take the perimeter of the semi-circle. :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi fghtffyrdmns! :smile:

(have a pi: π and try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)


πr2/2 + 2rh is correct for the area.

But when they say "as costly to build per metre", I think they mean you have to take the perimeter of the semi-circle. :wink:


Would the perimieter be just \pi r?
 
fghtffyrdmns said:
Would the perimieter be just \pi r?

(what happened to that π i gave you? :confused:)

Yup! :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
(what happened to that π i gave you? :confused:)

Yup! :smile:

So I would useP = (\pi r)+ 2r+ 2h to create the cost function of C(r) = 3(\pi r)+ 2r+ 2h?
 
Moderator's note: giving complete solutions to homework problems is against our forum guidelines.

(Solution deleted.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Your answer is correct: according to the textbook. I am confused though for where the c comes from.
 
fghtffyrdmns said:
Your answer is correct: according to the textbook. I am confused though for where the c comes from.
The problem does not specify the cost per unit length of the window, so a truly general expression for the cost would include this (unknown) parameter. kyp4 has denoted this as c.

As it turns out, the solution to this problem does not depend on the value of c. So setting up the problem as if c is 1 dollar per meter (as you did) works fine.
 
Alright,

so I have P = (\pi r)+ 2r+ 2h and S.A = (\pi r^2)/2 + 2rh.

From this, I can solve for h in the area function - as it asks in terms of area.

I get h =\frac{A}{2r} - \frac{\pi r}{4}

Knowing that the perimeter of the semi circle is 3x as costly, you get C(r) = 3(\pi r)+ 2r+ 2h Substituting h into the cost function, you get C(r) = \frac{5\pi r}{2} + 2r + \frac{A}{r}

Now, do I determine the derivative and solve for r? After determining r, I substitute into the formula for h which then I can solve h/r?
 
  • #10
I apologize for revealing the complete solution. I am new to the forums and did not realize this was against forum policy. Makes sense though.

While setting c=1 works out, it is more proper to consider it as some arbitrary variable c and it will disappear if it turns out not to be relevant as in this case. This will guard you against the case in which c turns out to be crucial to solving the problem, which will become evident if you end up with the variable in your resulting equations.

That being said, the procedure you described at the end of you last post fghtffyrdmns, should lead you to the same result as I got (whose correctness I am still not certain :redface:).
 
  • #11
C(r) = \frac{5\pi r}{2} + 2r + \frac{A}{r}

C'(r) = \frac{5\pi}{2} + 2 - \frac{A}{r^2}

I got r = \sqrt{\frac{A}{\frac{5\pi}{2} + 2}}

Should I simply this or can I sub it into the equation?

h =\frac{A}{2}{\sqrt{\frac{\frac{5\pi}{2} + 2}{A}} - \frac{\pi}{4}\sqrt{\frac{A}{\frac{5\pi}{2} + 2}

Now, I do not know how to solve the h/r :/. The book comes out with {\pi}+1.

Kyp, you are correct about not putting the c=1 constant in this - however, I do not know how you did it.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Regarding the arbitrary variable c, it appears in C(r) as a coefficient of all the terms, that is

<br /> C(r) = \frac{5\pi cr}{2} + 2cr + \frac{Ac}{r}<br />

and is canceled out when solving for r after setting the derivative to zero, arriving at the same result you got. Try it. You've got the correct results for r and h and have simplified them as far as they can be simplified. Simply substitute the expressions you got above into h/r and you'll find that the square roots cancel and combine to get you the correct result.
 
  • #13
kyp4 said:
Regarding the arbitrary variable c, it appears in C(r) as a coefficient of all the terms, that is

<br /> C(r) = \frac{5\pi cr}{2} + 2cr + \frac{Ac}{r}<br />

and is canceled out when solving for r after setting the derivative to zero, arriving at the same result you got. Try it. You've got the correct results for r and h and have simplified them as far as they can be simplified. Simply substitute the expressions you got above into h/r and you'll find that the square roots cancel and combine to get you the correct result.

See, this is where I am having a problem.

I do not know how to solve h/r. Do I have to rationalize? Or did I make a mistake with my h value so the roots do not cancel?
 
  • #14
You simply substitute:

<br /> \frac{h}{r} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\frac{A}{\frac{5\pi}{2} + 2}}}\left[\frac{A}{2}{\sqrt{\frac{\frac{5\pi}{2} + 2}{A}} - \frac{\pi}{4}\sqrt{\frac{A}{\frac{5\pi}{2} + 2}\right] = \frac{A}{2}\frac{\left(\frac{5\pi}{2}+2\right)}{A}-\frac{\pi}{4} = \pi + 1<br />
 
  • #15
kyp4 said:
You simply substitute:

<br /> \frac{h}{r} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\frac{A}{\frac{5\pi}{2} + 2}}}\left[\frac{A}{2}{\sqrt{\frac{\frac{5\pi}{2} + 2}{A}} - \frac{\pi}{4}\sqrt{\frac{A}{\frac{5\pi}{2} + 2}\right] = \frac{A}{2}\frac{\left(\frac{5\pi}{2}+2\right)}{A}-\frac{\pi}{4} = \pi + 1<br />

See, how come the square roots disappear on both of them? The algebra is confusing me.

Edit: I figured it out how you get the \pi + 1 after you do the first part. It's the radicals that are confusing me, however.
 
Last edited:
  • #16
Yes the radicals can make it confusing. Is it clear that

<br /> \frac{\sqrt{\frac{\frac{5\pi}{2} + 2}{A}}}{\sqrt{\frac{A}{\frac{5\pi}{2} + 2}}} = \sqrt{\frac{\frac{5\pi}{2} + 2}{A}}\sqrt{\frac{\frac{5\pi}{2} + 2}{A}} = \frac{\frac{5\pi}{2} + 2}{A}<br />

and

<br /> \frac{\sqrt{\frac{A}{\frac{5\pi}{2} + 2}}}{\sqrt{\frac{A}{\frac{5\pi}{2} + 2}}} = 1<br />

? If so, the rest should follow.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K