Minimize entropy of P = maximize entropy of ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mnb96
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Entropy
mnb96
Messages
711
Reaction score
5
minimize entropy of P == maximize entropy of ?

Hello,
I am facing the following problem:

- I have distribution (or function) which depends on some parameter.
- I want to find the parameter which minimizes the entropy of the distribution.

In the particular situation I am facing I really need to reformulate this problem in a entropy-maximization problem.

In other words, is it possible to find a P' for which maximizing its entropy, is equivalent to minimize the entropy of P?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


If I understand your question right, you have a conditional probability distribution, e.g. p(x|y) conditional on y. You want to find the y that minimizes the entropy of p(x|y).

Then you hope finding some transformation x -> z so that the y that maximizes the entropy of p(z|y) minimizes that of p(x|y).

In that case, the short answer is: no, it is not possible.
 


Perhaps you could be a bit more specific about what you're trying to do? Why are you interested in the minimum-entropy parameter, and why would you want to recast such a problem as a maximum-entropy problem? I can think of some examples where an entropy minimization could be re-written as an entropy maximization of a related distribution, but they're all kind of trivial, and I can't think of a case where doing so wouldn't just be a needless complication.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Back
Top