Minimizing final velocity on a balistic trajectory

AI Thread Summary
To minimize the final velocity of a baseball thrown to a kid in the stands, the player should aim for a trajectory that peaks just as the ball reaches the child, resulting in zero vertical velocity at the apex. This approach utilizes the conservation of energy principle, where the final kinetic energy is minimized by controlling the initial kinetic energy and height. The discussion emphasizes that throwing the ball higher than necessary increases potential energy, while throwing it lower risks missing the catch. Mathematical strategies, such as using kinetic energy equations and boundary conditions, are suggested to simplify the calculations. Ultimately, achieving the optimal angle and initial velocity is crucial for minimizing the ball's final velocity.
flatmaster
Messages
497
Reaction score
2
I thought of the following academic problem while watching a baseball movie.

I ballplayer wishes to throw the game-winning ball to a kid in the stands. He wants to minimize the final velocity of the ball. Not the horizontal component of the velocity, but the the total magnitude of the velocity. Obviously, he controlls the initial angle and initial velocity. A line drive right at the kid is obviously leads to a maximum final velocity, while a high-arching trajectory also leads to a maximum velocity. There is some angle inbetween these two choices that leads to a minimum final velocity.

My intuition says the choice trajectory would be the one where the ball arives at the top of it's parabola with zero vertical velocity.

I don't have it on me know, but I wrote an equation for the final velocity, took it's derivative with respect to initial velocity, and set that equal to zero. Horrible math ensued. Any ideas on other math tricks for this academic problem? Conservation of energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
flatmaster said:
Conservation of energy?

Hi flatmaster! :smile:

Yup … conservation of energy means that KEf = KEi - mgh, where m is the mass of the ball, and h is the height of the stand.

So you minimise KEf by minimising KEi. :wink:
 
I would imagine that, ideally, you would want the ball to peak right when he catches it. Assuming conservation of energy, this will be the time when PE is highest... and correspondingly KE will be lowest.

If you threw the ball higher than this, you would have to put more E = PE + KE into it. If you threw it lower, the kid wouldn't be able to catch it.
 
I think I see the remainder of the proof. I take tiny tim's suggestion that minimizing KEi is easier mathematically. So I use the kenitic energy equation and use the additional bountry condition of ariving at the point x,y, to eliminate one of my remaining variables.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top