Minimum Acceleration of an ambulance

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the minimum acceleration required for an ambulance to reach an intersection before a traffic light turns red. The initial speed of the ambulance is converted to 19.44 m/s, and using the equation D = V(initial)t + 1/2at^2, an acceleration of 3.008 m/s² is derived. For the second part of the problem, the final speed is calculated using the kinematic equation vf² = vi² + 2aD, resulting in a speed of 26.96 m/s, which converts to approximately 97.056 km/h. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying kinematic equations to solve for both acceleration and final velocity. The calculations and methods discussed appear to be confirmed as correct.
Austin Gibson
Messages
47
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


An ambulance driver is rushing a patient to the hospital. While traveling at 70 km/h, she notices the traffic light at the upcoming intersections has turned amber. To reach the intersection before the light turns red, she must travel 58 m in 2.5 s.

1.
What minimum acceleration (in m/s2) must the ambulance have to reach the intersection before the light turns red? (Enter the magnitude.)

2.
What is the speed (in km/h) of the ambulance when it reaches the intersection?

Picture of question: https://gyazo.com/cc955179090381952a181d7d7926d3d1

Homework Equations


D = V(initial)t + 1/2at^2[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm genuinely unsure where to begin. Please, share a couple hints.[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Austin Gibson said:

Homework Equations


D = V(initial)t + 1/2at^2[/B]

This equation already is a very good start to solve question #1. Which values can you assign to the respective symbols in the formula?
 
I converted the initial velocity to 19.44 m/s. Then, I inserted the numbers and solved for the acceleration. I derived 3.008 m/s^2 for acceleration. I'm assuming I can insert that to isolate the distance in the original equation?
 
Last edited:
Austin Gibson said:
I converted the initial velocity to 19.44 m/s. Then, I inserted the numbers and solved for the acceleration. I derived 3.008 m/s^2 for acceleration. I'm assuming I can insert that to isolate the final velocity in "vf^2 = vi^2 + 2aD"?

So you've already answered the first question - not a problem obviously. Solving the second question with the work-energy theorem seems a little bit pedestrian (even if it is possible). Maybe you can think about a kinematic correlation to solve the problem, like you did for the first question?
 
I calculated 58m for distance and then I inserted that into "vf^2 = vi^2 + 2aD." I then derived 26.96 m/s which is 97.056 km/h. May someone confirm this?
 
Seems correct to me.
 
stockzahn said:
Seems correct to me.
Thank you for your assistance!
 
Austin Gibson said:
I converted the initial velocity to 19.44 m/s. Then, I inserted the numbers and solved for the acceleration. I derived 3.008 m/s^2 for acceleration. I'm assuming I can insert that to isolate the distance in the original equation?
The distance was given, why to isolate it?
How does the velocity change with time ?
 
Back
Top