Minimum distance required to reach maximum velocity.

AI Thread Summary
To reach a maximum velocity of 5000°/s with an acceleration of 30000°/s², the motor requires a minimum travel distance of 417°. It cannot achieve this speed in just 5°. The calculation involves determining the time to reach maximum speed, which is 1/6 seconds, and the average speed during that time, which is 2500°/s. The distance covered during this acceleration phase is derived from the average speed multiplied by the time. Thus, the motor needs significantly more distance than 5° to reach its maximum velocity.
AmazingTrans
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi there!

I have a basic question here, hopefully someone can brush physics up for me.
I have a motor that is capable of max velocity of 5000°/s, and max acceleration of 30000°/s².

What is the minimum distance that the motor need to travel before it reaches that max velocity?
Can it make it in 5°?

AT
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No it can't. For constant acceleration, the equation you need is
$$v^2=u^2+\frac12 as$$
where ##u## and ##v## are initial and final velocity, ##a## is acceleration and ##s## is distance (or angle in this case) travelled.
 
AmazingTrans said:
Hi there!

I have a basic question here, hopefully someone can brush physics up for me.
I have a motor that is capable of max velocity of 5000°/s, and max acceleration of 30000°/s².

What is the minimum distance that the motor need to travel before it reaches that max velocity?
Can it make it in 5°?

AT

A simple way to do this from first principles is:

It takes ##5000/30000 = 1/6## seconds to reach maximum speed at max acceleration.

The average speed during this time will be half the maximum speed. This is ##2500°/s##

The angle rotated during this time is, therefore: ##2500 \times 1/6 = 417°##
 
Thanks!
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top