Minimum Height for Loop in Frictionless Incline Track

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the minimum height required for a mass to successfully navigate a frictionless incline and complete a loop. The key formula presented is mg(hmin) = mvb²/2 + mg2R, indicating that the minimum height must be at least 2R. However, there is confusion regarding the velocity at the top of the loop, as vb cannot be zero; a minimum speed is necessary to maintain contact with the track. The conversation emphasizes the importance of applying energy conservation principles and Newton's second law to accurately calculate the minimum height. Ultimately, understanding the kinetic energy component is crucial for solving the problem correctly.
mrshappy0
Messages
97
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A mass is placed at the top of a frictionless incline track. The bottom of the track goes into a loop. At what minimum height does the block with mass m have to be released above the ground in order to reach point b (the top of the loop).


Homework Equations




mg(hmin)=mvb2/2 +mg2R.

The Attempt at a Solution



The above formula shows that the minimum height has to be 2R because vb=0. I understand that Ugravity= mgh. But I don't understand why mv^2/2 was added on the right side. I am sitting here study my textbook and can't make sense of it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mrshappy0 said:
The above formula shows that the minimum height has to be 2R because vb=0.
How fast must the block be moving at the top of the loop in order to maintain contact? (vb = 0 won't work.)
 
That is from the answer key of a past exam. Maybe I stated it incorrectly. It seems right. If the block is just barely reaching that point that means that it is also stopping there which would make the velocity zero.
 
mrshappy0 said:
That is from the answer key of a past exam. Maybe I stated it incorrectly. It seems right. If the block is just barely reaching that point that means that it is also stopping there which would make the velocity zero.
There's a minimum speed required at the top (greater than zero) otherwise the block will leave the track before ever reaching the top.

There's nothing wrong with that formula: it's just energy conservation. But if the answer key says that vb = 0, that's incorrect.
 
Okay, well more importantly is that equation an example of the Mechanical Energy= Kinetic Energy+ potential energy?
 
mrshappy0 said:
Okay, well more importantly is that equation an example of the Mechanical Energy= Kinetic Energy+ potential energy?
Sure. But if you actually wanted to solve for the minimum height, you'd need to input a minimum value for the kinetic energy term. (You'd solve for that term by applying Newton's 2nd law at the top of the loop.)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top