Minimum Size in spin networks/foams.

  • Thread starter Thread starter MTd2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Minimum Spin
MTd2
Gold Member
Messages
2,019
Reaction score
25
I must put both of them because I want to have an idea of dynamics here, of scattering and of geometry at the same time. I will rewrite what I put in another thread:

"Matter field is something that lives on a spin foam like electical fields on a electrical grid structure. Any possible experiment done by whoever lives on that grid will be like obtaing an eigenvalue of a surface operator. But what moves is the matter field, so any measurement of an area will be irrespective of its energy-momentum."

By the way, when a measurement is made, a spin network is picked out of a spin foam, right? So, the area measured is one of a spin network.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I replied already to what you said in the other thread. I will have to look back and see what I said.
MTd2 said:
...
By the way, when a measurement is made, a spin network is picked out of a spin foam, right? So, the area measured is one of a spin network.
 
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.09804 From the abstract: ... Our derivation uses both EE and the Newtonian approximation of EE in Part I, to describe semi-classically in Part II the advection of DM, created at the level of the universe, into galaxies and clusters thereof. This advection happens proportional with their own classically generated gravitational field g, due to self-interaction of the gravitational field. It is based on the universal formula ρD =λgg′2 for the densityρ D of DM...
Back
Top