Programs Minor in Physics: Chemistry or Math?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dEdt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Minor
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a first-year physics undergraduate exploring a specialization in nanotechnology and nanoelectronics. The student seeks advice on whether to minor in chemistry or math, or neither, while also questioning the extent of physics involved in nanotech. Participants emphasize the importance of math for theoretical work in nanotechnology, noting that advanced math is beneficial for analyses and simulations. They also highlight the relevance of chemistry, particularly in solid-state chemistry and nanomaterials, which are crucial for understanding fabrication techniques. The consensus is that both math and chemistry can enhance a physics background, and students are encouraged to take courses in both areas to better inform their specialization choices. Ultimately, the path taken should align with individual interests in theoretical versus experimental aspects of nanotechnology.
dEdt
Messages
286
Reaction score
2
This will probably come off as a very vague question, so I appologize in advance.

I am a first year physics undergraduate, and for the past year or so I have dedicated much time and effort towards deciding what area of physics I would like to specialize in. At the moment, one field that interests me in particular is nanotech and nanoelectronics. If I were to pursue that, should I minor in chemistry or in math (or neither)?


A related questiton: how much physics is there in nanotech? I love physics, and I love working with the math that accompanies it. If I choose to study nanotech, will I loose that part of the physics? Or is there room for a more theoretical approach to nanotechnology?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dEdt said:
This will probably come off as a very vague question, so I appologize in advance.

I am a first year physics undergraduate, and for the past year or so I have dedicated much time and effort towards deciding what area of physics I would like to specialize in. At the moment, one field that interests me in particular is nanotech and nanoelectronics. If I were to pursue that, should I minor in chemistry or in math (or neither)?


A related questiton: how much physics is there in nanotech? I love physics, and I love working with the math that accompanies it. If I choose to study nanotech, will I loose that part of the physics? Or is there room for a more theoretical approach to nanotechnology?

Thanks in advance.

First off, I'm also a first year physics undergrad, so take what I say with a grain of salt. I would say that in general, any sort of physics degree is going to be supplemented well by taking math classes. At least at my school, the math reqs for a physics degree are relatively low, so I'm double majoring in both physics and math. And I don't know what exactly goes into nanotech jobs, so I can't help you on your specific question. I'd imagine that chemistry would help as well though, so maybe just taking a minor in chemistry and taking some extra math classes will be for you. But make sure you take the right classes of chemistry that would cater towards nanotech.
 
Thanks for the advice...I was actually thinking about doing it the other way around and minoring in math, while taking a few chemistry courses along the way. I figure it will be easier to go from physics to nanotechnology than the other way around, and I'm still not so sure about what I really want to specialize in later.

On the other hand, I would have a better chance of self-studying the math, so perhaps not.
 
Nanotech is a rather wide field you know, so it really comes down to what you want to do. I'm not in the field myself, but my BSc thesis was essentially an experimental nanofabrication project, together with associated physics theory and data treatment, so I have at least had extensive contact with one research group.

Math is always useful for physics, so in nanotech the more advanced math will mostly be useful in theoretical work/analyses/simulations. That probably ties mostly into the experimental nanosciences. Chemistry has it place in solid state chemistry and nanomaterials, as well as in the development of nanofabrication techniques.There are some interesting stuff going on with synthesized molecules as well, such as the nanocar. On the whole I have the idea though, that the chemistry in nanotech tends to be along the lines of physical chemistry and material science.

For nanoelectronics the spectrum is similar. Do you want to do theoretical work, then it's math (and physics obviously). To have full understanding of the fabrication then there's a lot of surface science and physical chemistry. A lot of the nanoelectronics comes down to the fabrication and the interactions - both chemical and physical - between different materials.

So in summary there's the usual answer: it depends. I hope this illuminates some of the possibillities. And it certainly doesn't hurt to take a chemistry course or two to see what it's like.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
43
Views
7K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Back
Top