Misunderstanding time dilation and length contraction

Gavroy
Messages
232
Reaction score
0
hi

sorry about my english. i am from france.
i have a few questions about the image i have found in my schoolbook that i attached to this post.

there is a light signal moving up and down and each time it reaches the upper mirror this is somehow detected. there are also two observers: one standing outside(oberserver 1) and one moving with the system and now my textbook says that no matter whether this thing is moving horizontal(as the arrow shows) or vertical(not shown in this picture) to the oberserver standing outside, this guy would detect the same click rate, but i highly doubt it.

let me start with the observer moving with the aperature. he is the one who measures no time dilation as he is moving with the system and measures no length contraction, so the time he waites for a click is t=2l/c where l is the length of this thing.

while the oberserver standing outside will measure a time dilation when the aperature is moving horizontal to him.
that means that he is just waiting: t=2l/c*(1-v^2/c^2)^(1/2) for a click.

WHILE

if the aperature is also moving vertical than there will also be a length contraction and therefore: t=2l/c as both square roots cancel out.

but where am i wrong?
 

Attachments

  • special relativity.jpg
    special relativity.jpg
    10.5 KB · Views: 465
Physics news on Phys.org
Gavroy said:
WHILE

if the aperature is also moving vertical than there will also be a length contraction and therefore: t=2l/c as both square roots cancel out.

but where am i wrong?
You forgot to take into account that the apparatus moves during the clock tick. So the distance traveled by the light is not simply twice the contracted length between the mirrors.
 
perhaps this will be more clear:

www.phinds.com/time dilation
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...

Similar threads

Back
Top