MIT developed a cheap artificial leaf

  • Thread starter Thread starter dlgoff
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mit
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a recent article from Photonics Spectra about an innovative "artificial leaf" technology that utilizes a triple-junction silicon wafer coated with NiMoZn and Co-OEC for direct solar energy conversion through water splitting, producing hydrogen and oxygen bubbles. This method represents a potential advancement in solar panel technology, as it allows for hydrogen production directly from sunlight, which can be used to create ammonia for fertilizers without the costly step of hydrogen extraction from natural gas. The conversation highlights the advantages of this process over traditional ammonia manufacturing, which relies on methane reforming and the Haber-Bosch process. The potential for distributed ammonia production in developing countries, where sunlight is abundant and soil fertility is low, is emphasized as a significant benefit. Additionally, the term "nonlegacy" users is discussed, referring to individuals or communities that have not participated in the fossil fuel economy, often found in less developed regions. This terminology suggests a shift towards recognizing energy sources that are not reliant on fossil fuels.
dlgoff
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,441
Reaction score
3,275
I just read the Photonics Spectra article "Artificial leaf could charge up developing world". The research was published in the American Chemical Society journal which I don't have access to, but from the Abstract, this would be interesting to observe:

..immersing a triple-junction Si wafer coated with NiMoZn and Co-OEC in water and holding it up to sunlight can effect direct solar energy conversion via water splitting.

H2 and O2 bubbles :cool:
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
This would be the new generation of fuel cells. Solar panels convert sunlight directly into electricity but this process produces hydrogen gas. Much better IMO since hydrogen gas can be used as a reagent to make other useful things like ammonia from the nitrogen in the air. Imagine using this to produce ammonia for fertilizer without the expensive step of converting natural gas to hydrogen first.

Compare the usual ammonia manufacturing process based on the catalytic reforming of methane to produce hydrogen followed by the Haber-Bosch process to make ammonia to this simple photo-hydrogen process.

Pretty exciting but large arrays will need to be employed for truly industrial scale manufacture. This does suggest that since the hard part (hydrogen production from steam reforming of methane) becomes easy, we could have a more distributed manufacturing process for ammonia. Perhaps a plant on every farm in every third world country where sunlight is plentiful and soil fertility is low.
 
Thanks for the clarification chemisttree.

What does "nonlegacy" users mean?
 
ChiralWaltz said:
Thanks for the clarification chemisttree.

What does "nonlegacy" users mean?

I believe that it means folks that haven't been a part of the fossil fuel economy. If you buy electricity from a local coal-fired or natural gas-fired plant, you are a legacy user. You operate from a framework built by energy providers based on fossil fuels. Some would call this the 'developed' world.

If you have never bought electricity because you can't afford it or there is no local provider you have no 'legacy' stretching back to fossil fuel-based energy... you are a new, 'nonlegacy' user of energy derived from a new, non-fossil fuel source. This could also be called the 'undeveloped' or 'non-developed' world. I think this is the new politically correct nomenclature for these countries.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top