Model Universe: Shortest Path to Gravity Corridors

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dennis Sugden
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Modeling Universe
Dennis Sugden
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Several years ago, after reading about Wheeler's quantum foam, I wondered what would happen if you used wormhole propogation and a quality in some wormhole positions to prefer taking the shortest distance to the next position (mass) to try to reproduce effects similar to gravity. I had also just read about gravity "corridors" used by NASA and I wanted to see what they were like.

I programed my computer to start at three (mass) positions; one a factor of 100, one of 10, and one of 1. [this is all 2D] As I wasn't concerned to exactly match gravity an arbitrary length was established as the unconstrained wormhole length. I don't remember exactly what it was. I remember I chose it to make it easier to shade colors on my screen display. Then at each mass position and at each point on the screen going in circles around the (masses) a value of that wormhole length was calculated. eg at point (mass 1) length = Arbitrary/2; point (mass 1-1) = Arbitrary/2; point (mass1-2) = Arbitrary /4; etc.

When all points had been calculated each mass randomly moved to the new calculated level but preferred a new position that involved the shortest length.

On the computer I had then this ran forever but as I was shading screen colors to show short to long points I could watch it slowly change.

Point is I got curvatures that bent hypothetical light rays and even frame dragging. And I got to look at my gravity corridors.

Marcus, does this in any way connect to the models some of your posts refer to?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dennis Sugden said:
Marcus, does this in any way connect to the models some of your posts refer to?

Dennis, what you programmed sounds like a visually intriguing process to watch. I can't tell how or if it relates to the computerized universe models I've been reading about lately. That would be something for you to decide.

The models I am most interested in are of two kinds. one type is what they run at Utrecht Institute of Theoretical Physics---a lead author is named Renate Loll

the other is a kind of model they run at Penn State, particularly Ashtekar's group and also Bojowald.

The field is a relatively new one called Quantum Cosmology and it is sort of on the borderline between QG (in the Beyond forum) and Cosmology (in the Cosmology forum).
The current research can, i guess, be discussed in either place.

Have a look at the literature just to see what I'm talking about. Don't get bogged down in heavy details, just take a glance.

Here are Loll's papers
http://arxiv.org/find/grp_physics/1/au:+Loll/0/1/0/all/0/1
The one titled "Quantum Gravity on Your Desktop" describes some of the computer simulations of quantum universes

Here are recent (keyword=quantum cosmology) papers in the Stanford database, sorted by number of citations. the most highly cited papers appear first
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?rawcmd=k+quantum+cosmology+and+date+%3E+2005&FORMAT=WWW&SEQUENCE=citecount%28d%29

If this kind of overview doesn't work for you, ask for links to some sample papers. But instead of delving into entire papers you can tell a little bit of what is going on by just looking at the titles and reading the abstracts (brief summaries).

It seems as if you made something beautiful on the computer that was inspired by Wheeler's conception of quantum foam, but it might be difficult to find a connection at the nutsbolts level.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
Back
Top