Model with SU(2) gauge symmetry and SO(3) global symmetry

jack476
Messages
327
Reaction score
125
Homework Statement
Full context:
We consider a model for an ##SU(2)## doublet with the following Lagrangian:
##L = -\frac{1}{4}F^a_{\mu\nu}F^a_{\mu\nu}+(D_{\mu}\varphi)^{\dagger}(D_{\mu}\varphi)+\mu^2 \varphi^\dagger \varphi -\lambda(\varphi^\dagger \varphi)^2## where ##D_\mu \varphi = \partial_\mu \varphi -\frac{1}{2}A^a?\mu \tau^a \varphi## and ##\tau^a## are the generators of the Lie algebra of ##SU(2)## (the Pauli matrices) and the ##A^a_\mu## are real-valued functions.

We choose the following as the ground state: ##A^{a,(v)}_\mu = 0, \varphi^{(v)} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\begin{bmatrix}0 \\ \varphi_0 \end{bmatrix}## where ##\varphi_0 = \frac{\mu}{\sqrt{2\lambda}}##, and we consider small excitations about the ground state with the form ##\varphi = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\begin{bmatrix}\theta^1 +i\theta^2 \\ \varphi_0 + \chi +i\theta^3\end{bmatrix}##. Notice that under the ##SU(2)## transformation ##\varphi \to \omega(x)\varphi## where ##\omega = I+i\tau^a u^a(x)## where the ##u^a## are small real functions, to linear order in the fields, the ##\chi## function does not change, but the ##\theta## functions each pick up a new term which will depend on the ##u## functions, so only the ##\chi## function represents a physical scalar boson field and the ##\theta## fields are arbitrary "fictitious" bosons. To quadratic order in the fields, we can eliminate these from the Lagrangian by substituting ##\varphi## into the Lagrangian, expanding, and making a change of the gauge field variables that gets rid of the ##\theta## terms, or alternatively by fixing a unitary gauge in which ##\varphi = \frac{1}{2}\begin{bmatrix}0 \\ \varphi_0 + \chi \end{bmatrix}## and then expanding the Lagrangian. Either way, the quadratic-order Lagrangian turns out to be ##L^{(2)} = -\frac{1}{4}(\partial_{\mu}A^a_{\nu}-\partial_{\nu}A^a_{\mu})^2 + \frac{1}{2}(\partial_\mu \chi)^2+\frac{1}{8}g^2 \varphi_0^2 A^a_{\mu}A^a_{\mu} -\mu^2\chi^2##. In this case, all three of the vector boson fields ##A^a_\mu## have the same mass, ##m_V = \frac{g\varphi_0}{2}.##

We can write the ##SU(2)## doublet in the form ##\begin{bmatrix}\eta^1+i\eta^2 \\ u + i\eta^3\end{bmatrix}##. Then the scalar potential for the model can be written ##-\mu^2(u^2+\eta^a\eta^a) +\lambda(u^2+\eta^a\eta^a)^2##, and this potential has a global ##SO(3)## invariance where ##u## is a scalar that transforms according to the trivial representation of ##SO(3)## (singlet) and the ##\eta^a## are the components of a vector in ##\mathbb{R}^3## that transform according to the fundamental representation of ##SO(3)## (triplet). This global ##SO(3)## invariance is not spontaneously broken by the chosen ground state ##\varphi^{(v)} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\begin{bmatrix}0 \\ \varphi_0\end{bmatrix}##.

Problem statement:
1.) Choose a transformation rule for the gauge vector fields so that the Lagrangian for the model is invariant under global ##SO(3)## transformations.
2.) Show that the equality of the masses of the vector bosons in the quadratic Lagrangian is a consequence of the fully unbroken global ##SO(3)## symmetry.

Source: Valery Rubakov, Classical Theory of Gauge Fields, problem 6.6.
Relevant Equations
Everything is given in the problem statement.
1.) The rule for the global ##SO(3)## transformation of the gauge vector field is ##A^i_{\mu} \to \omega_{ij}A^j_{\mu}## for ##\omega \in SO(3)##.

The proof is by direct calculation. First, if ##A^i_{\mu} \to \omega_{ij}A^j_{\mu}## then ##F^i_{\mu \nu} \to \omega_{ij}F^j_{\mu\nu}##, so ##F^i_{\mu\nu}F^i_{\mu\nu} \to \omega_{ij}\omega_{ik}F^j_{\mu\nu}F^k_{\mu\nu} = \delta_{jk}F^j_{\mu\nu}F^k_{\mu\nu} = F^j_{\mu\nu}F^j_{\mu\nu}##, and in general "dot product" terms ##x^iy^i## are invariant under ##SO(3)## transformations. so the part with the strength tensor is invariant. Now we expand the kinetic energy: ##(D_{\mu}\varphi)^{\dagger}(D_{\mu}\varphi) = (\partial_{\mu}u)^2 + (\partial_{\mu}\eta^i)^2 +g\big(\epsilon^{ijk}(\partial_{\mu}\eta^i)A_{\mu}^j\eta^k+(\partial_{\mu}u)A^i_\mu\eta^i-uA^i_{\mu}\partial_{\mu}\eta^i\big)+\frac{g^2}{4}A^a_{\mu}A^a_{\mu}(u^2+\eta^i\eta^i)##> The dot product terms are all invariant. The "cross product" ##\epsilon^{ijk}A^j_{\mu}\eta^k## transforms to ##\epsilon^{ijk}\omega_{jl}\omega_{km}A^l_{\mu}\eta^m## and by the rotation invariance of the cross product this is equal to ##\omega_{il}\epsilon^{ljk}A^j_{\mu}\eta^k##, so ##\epsilon^{ijk}(\partial_{\mu}\eta^i)A_{\mu}^j\eta^k \to \omega_{ij}\omega_{il}\epsilon^{ljk}(\partial_{\mu}\eta^j)A_{\mu}^j\eta^k = \epsilon^{ijk}(\partial_{\mu}\eta^i)A_{\mu}^j\eta^k##. The invariance of dot products under ##SO(3)## means that the potential is also invariant. Therefore the Lagrangian is invariant under global ##SO(3)## transformations of the form ##u \to u, \eta^i \to \omega_{ij}\eta^j, A^i_\mu \to \omega_{ij}A^j_\mu##.

Simple enough. The second part is really where I'm having trouble.

For simplicity, and without losing generality, we can spontaneously break the ##SO(3)## symmetry down to ##SO(2)## by choosing the ground state $$\varphi^{(v)} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\begin{bmatrix}0 \\ \phi_0+iv\end{bmatrix}$$
Let's consider small excitations about this ground state with the form $$\varphi = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\begin{bmatrix}\theta^1+i\theta2 \\ \phi_0+\chi+i(v+\theta^3)\end{bmatrix}$$ Let ##\omega(x) = I+i\tau^a u^a## be an SU(2) gauge transformation where the ##u^a## are small. Then to linear order:
$$\omega\varphi = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\begin{bmatrix}\theta^1+\varphi_0u^2-vu^1+i(\theta^2+\varphi_0u^1+vu^2) \\ \varphi_0+ \chi +vu^3+i(v+\theta^3 - \varphi_0u^3)\end{bmatrix}$$
The ##\chi## function has picked up a non-constant term ##vu^3##. This means that as a result of spontaneously breaking the ##SO(3)## global symmetry, the ##\chi## function has been demoted from a Higgs field to a fictitious field which we will need to eliminate from the Lagrangian.

We'll fix the gauge and set ##\theta^1=\theta^2=\theta^3=0##. Then to linear order in the fields:
$$D_{\mu}\varphi = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\begin{bmatrix}0 \\ \partial_{\mu}\chi \end{bmatrix} -\frac{ig}{2\sqrt{2}}A^a_{\mu}\tau^a\begin{bmatrix}0 \\ \varphi_0+iv\end{bmatrix}$$
Then to quadratic order, ##(D_{\mu}\varphi)^\dagger (D_{\mu}\varphi) = \frac{1}{2}(\partial_{\mu}\chi)^2-\frac{1}{2}gvA^3_{\mu}\partial_{\mu}\chi+\frac{1}{8}g^2(v^2+\varphi^2_0)A^a_{\mu}A^a_{\mu}##. For the ##a=3## component, we have: $$\begin{align*}\frac{1}{2}(\partial_{\mu}\chi)^2 -\frac{1}{2}gvA^3_\mu\partial_{\mu}\chi+\frac{1}{8}g^2(v^2+\varphi_0^2)A^3_{\mu}A^3_{\mu} &= \frac{1}{8}g^2v^2\left(A^3_{\mu}-\frac{2}{gv}\partial_{\mu}\chi\right)^2+\frac{1}{8}g^2\varphi_0^2A^3_{\mu}A^3_{\mu}\\
&\equiv \frac{g^2v^2}{8}B^3_{\mu}B^3_{\mu}+\frac{g^2\varphi_0^2}{8}A^3_{\mu}A^3_{\mu}
\end{align*}$$
And from here I don't really know how to proceed. I could factor this into a product of complex fields, but there seems to be some ambiguity in how I can do that. For instance, I could set ##Z^{\pm}_{\mu} = B^3_{\mu}\pm i\frac{\varphi_0}{v}A^3_{\mu}## so that ##\frac{g^2v^2}{8}B^3_{\mu}B^3_{\mu}+\frac{g^2\varphi_0^2}{8}A^3_{\mu}A^3_{\mu} = \frac{g^2v^2}{8}Z^{+}_{\mu}Z^{-}_{\mu}## or I could do ##Z^{\pm}_{\mu} = \frac{vB^3_{\mu} \pm i\varphi_0A^3_{\mu}}{\sqrt{\varphi_0^2+v^2}}## so that ##\frac{g^2v^2}{8}B^3_{\mu}B^3_{\mu}+\frac{g^2\varphi_0^2}{8}A^3_{\mu}A^3_{\mu} = \frac{g^2(v^2+\varphi_0^2)}{8}Z^{+}_{\mu}Z^{-}_{\mu}##.

So how do I finish this off and show that the three vector fields do not all have the same mass? Am I making a mistake somewhere?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I figured it out.

By Noether's theorem, there is a conserved current ##j^a_{\mu}## associated with this global ##SO(3)## symmetry, and there is an energy associated with this current that is proportional to ##j^a_{\mu}A^a_{\mu}##. Let ##t^{ij}_a## be component ##i, j## of the ##a##th generator of the Lie algebra of ##SO(3)##. Then the Noether current is:
$$\begin{align*} j^a_{\mu} &= \frac{\partial L}{\partial(\partial_{\mu}A^i_{\nu})}t^{ij}_aA^j_{\nu} + \frac{\partial L}{\partial(\partial_{\mu}\eta^i)}t^{ij}_a\eta^j\\
&= \epsilon^{aij}\big(-F^i_{\mu\nu}A^j_{\nu}+2(\partial_{\mu}\eta^i)\eta^j+g\eta^j\epsilon^{ikl}A^k_{\mu}\eta^l-uA^i_{\mu}\eta^j\big)\end{align*}$$
Break the symmetry with an arbitrary ground state ##\varphi^{(vz)} = \begin{bmatrix}v^1+iv^2 \\ \varphi_0+iv^3\end{bmatrix}## and consider small excitations where ##u = \varphi_0+\chi## and ##\eta^i = v^i+\theta^i##. To quadratic order in the fields, $$j^a_{\mu}A^a_{\mu} = 2\epsilon^{aij}v^j A^a_{\mu}\partial_{\mu}\theta^i+g\epsilon^{aij}\epsilon^{ikl}v^l v^j A^a_{\mu} A^k_{\mu}-\varphi_0 \epsilon^{aij}v^jA^a_{\mu}A^i_{\mu}$$
This quantity is zero only if all three ##v^i## are zero, and if any of the ##v^i## are nonzero then in general the interaction energy between the gauge field and the Noether current contributes different amounts of mass to each of the three vector bosons, after making a change of variables that gets rid of the ##\partial_{\mu}\theta^i## terms.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top