Modeling a Set of Random Points Along the X-Axis with an Equation

AI Thread Summary
Creating an equation to model a set of random points along the x-axis, with y coordinates as integers between 1 and 30, is feasible. The discussion suggests using a line of best fit or more complex methods like Lagrange Interpolating Polynomial for precise modeling. The goal is to develop an equation that allows for regression analysis on the generated points. While achieving this may require a complex equation, it is considered possible with the right approach. The conversation emphasizes the need for guidance on how to construct such an equation effectively.
skyraider
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'd like to know if it's possible to create an equation to model set of points along the x-axis, where each point's y coordinate is an integer between 1 and, say, 30, and where y increases by a constant amount - say, 1 - for each x point. Example points include: (3, 1) (14, 2) (7, 3) and (27, 4) Can an equation be created with a computer program, or by hand, to model such a set of points to the extent that we can regress based on the equation?

Of course we can use a line of best fit, but can we create an equation to model such a random set of points with precision, i.e. to the extent that we can perform a 'regression' on the equation and extract the above points?

While this may not be feasible, I'm trying to figure out if it's possible at all.

I'm thinking that this is possible if just the right equation is created. It may be a long, drawn-out equation, but how do you think I could achieve this? A push in the right direction would be great.

Thanks! :)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top