Modeling Path of Object in General Relativistic/Riemannian Geom

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Philosophaie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Path
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on modeling the path of an object in the context of General Relativity and Riemannian geometry, specifically using the Earth and/or Sun as a framework. Participants explore the mathematical formulation of geodesic equations and the implications of the Schwarzschild metric on the motion of objects in a gravitational field.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests starting with the Schwarzschild metric and deriving geodesic equations, mentioning methods such as calculating Christoffel symbols or using the calculus of variations.
  • Another participant expresses a desire to find solutions to the geodesic equations for all values of θ, beyond the simplification to θ = π/2, indicating a need for more general solutions.
  • Discussion includes the conservation of angular momentum and energy in the context of spherical symmetry, with references to the implications of these symmetries on the motion of particles.
  • One participant notes the existence of analytical solutions only for special cases and mentions the use of perturbation theory to derive the precession of planetary orbits.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the use of the Schwarzschild metric and the conservation laws arising from spherical symmetry. However, there is disagreement regarding the feasibility of finding general solutions to the geodesic equations for arbitrary θ, with some participants expressing uncertainty about the existence of such solutions.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on specific assumptions about symmetry and the potential challenges in solving the geodesic equations analytically for all angles.

Philosophaie
Messages
456
Reaction score
0
I want to use the Earth and/or Sun to model a General Relativistic or Riemannian Geometric path of an object with an initial velocity coming into a gravitational field until it comes into contact with the ground or skips off in another direction. Does anyone have any suggestion where to start?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start by writing down the Schwarzschid metric for a spherically symmetric, nonrotating body:
[tex] ds^2 = -\left( 1 - \frac{2GM}{r} \right) \textrm{d} t^2 + \left( 1 - \frac{2GM}{r} \right)^{-1} \textrm{d} r^2 + r^2 ( \textrm{d} \theta^2 + \sin^2(\theta) \textrm{d} \varphi^2 ) \textrm{.}[/tex]
To get the geodesic equations from this, you can either calculate all the Christoffel symbols (long and tedious, but straightforward) or use the calculus of variations (my favorite method). In either case, I'd suggest setting [tex]e^{f(r)} = \left( 1 - \frac{2GM}{r} \right)[/tex] for ease of notation. You'll end up with four very ugly-looking equations (one for each of [tex]t, r, \theta[/tex], and [tex]\varphi[/tex]). By symmetry, you can set [tex]\theta = \frac{\pi}{2}[/tex] (i.e., [tex]\theta' = 0[/tex]). The [tex]t[/tex] equation will then give you [tex]e^{f(r)} t' = E[/tex], where [tex]E[/tex] is a constant of motion. The [tex]\varphi[/tex] equation will give [tex]r^2 \varphi' = L[/tex], where [tex]L[/tex] is another constant of motion ("angular momentum"). The [tex]r[/tex] equation gives
[tex] e^{-f(r)} (r')^2 + \frac{L^2}{r^2} - e^{-f(r)} E^2 = \epsilon \textrm{,}[/tex]
where [tex]\epsilon[/tex] is another consant of motion. For massive particles, you can set [tex]\epsilon = -1[/tex] without loss of generality (why?). Then you can rearrange the above equation to get
[tex] \frac{1}{2} (r')^2 + V(r) = \mathcal{E} \textrm{,}[/tex]
where [tex]V(r) = \frac{1}{2} \left(1 + \frac{L^2}{r^2} \right) e^{f(r)}[/tex] is a "potential energy" and [tex]\mathcal{E} = \frac{1}{2} E^2[/tex] is a "total energy." This looks exactly like the form of a classical equation of motion, and you can analyze it using similar techniques. In particular, determining values for [tex]E[/tex], [tex]L[/tex], and [tex]r_{0}[/tex] that lead to bounded or unbounded paths is straightforward.
 
Last edited:
The Schwarzschild metric is:

[tex]ds^{2}=-(1-2GM/r)dt^{2}+(1-2GM/r)^{-1}dr^{2}[/tex]...

I already calculated Affinity (Torsion=0), Riemann Tensor and the Ricci Tensor from the metric. I got the four ugly looking equations from the diagonal of the Geodesic Equation. This is where I get stuck. I would like to have more than just [tex]\theta=\pi/2[/tex]. Is there a solution or a set of solution to these four Geodesic Equations no matter how difficult for all [tex]\theta[/tex]?
 
The Schwarzschild metric is:

LaTeX Code: ds^{2}=-(1-2GM/r)dt^{2}+(1-2GM/r)^{-1}dr^{2} ...

Yeah...sorry about that. \facepalm

Due to spherical symmetry, you can always change coordinates so that [tex]\theta = \frac{\pi}{2}[/tex], [tex]\theta' = 0[/tex]. Briefly, this is because, since we have invariance under rotations, the "direction of angular momentum" is conserved, hence the motion of a particle must be planar. (More rigorously, to each Killing vector on a manifold we can associate a constant of geodesic motion. The timelike Killing vector of Schwarzschild yields conservation of "energy," while the three spherical Killing vectors yield conservation of the three components of the "angular momentum.")

I don't know of any analytical solutions to these equations, except for very special cases. Like I said, however, they're (fairly) straightforward to analyze nonetheless; for example, you can derive, without too much work, the rate of precession of the perihelion of a planet using perturbation theory (to a first approximation). You should get [tex]\Delta \varphi = \frac{6 \pi G^2 M^2}{L^2}[/tex], where [tex]\Delta \varphi[/tex] indicates the amount the perihelion advances per orbital period.
 
Thanks for the info!
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
8K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K