Modelling eddy currents in a pendulum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on simulating eddy currents in a copper pendulum entering a magnetic field, utilizing Faraday's law. The main challenge is managing the multiple variables involved in calculating the induced electric field (E) and current (J). A suggested approach is to simplify the problem by starting with a circular loop instead of a disk, analyzing its motion into the magnetic field before extending to the pendulum's arc. This method aims to clarify the relationship between the induced currents and the resulting retarding forces. The conversation highlights the importance of breaking down complex problems into manageable parts for effective simulation.
FabusMarco
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I was solving a problem related to Eddie currents recently and I need some help with simulating it numerically. Basically, we have a disc-like copper pendulum entering a region of uniform magnetic flux density B (see diagram). I understand that I need to use Faraday's law:
\nabla \times \vec{E} = - \frac {\partial{\vec B}} {\partial t},
but even if I assume B is in the z-direction and E is in the x-y plane, I am left with
\frac {\partial{E_y}} {\partial x} - \frac {\partial{E_x}} {\partial y} = - \frac {\partial{B}} {\partial t}.
Once I have E, I can find J and subsequently the current induced. However, do I not have too many variables? And how could I then find the retarding force, given that it depends on things like the velocity of moving charges?

Many thanks for your help in advance.

Diagram:
17887639_1382459645174041_1954335255_o.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If I were attacking this problem, I would not use a top-down approach. Instead of a disk, I would start with a circular loop; once I understand the loop, I can integrate loops to get the disk. Also, I would first consider the loop going into the field region in a straight line; once I understand that, I can extend to the arc of a pendulum.
 
kuruman said:
If I were attacking this problem, I would not use a top-down approach. Instead of a disk, I would start with a circular loop; once I understand the loop, I can integrate loops to get the disk. Also, I would first consider the loop going into the field region in a straight line; once I understand that, I can extend to the arc of a pendulum.
Thanks for the idea, I'll try it out!
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top