Modes and Q-factor(s) of a random laser

In summary, the conversation discusses the Q-factor of random lasers and how it is calculated. It is mentioned that random lasers have multiple peaks close to each other and the question is raised whether each peak corresponds to a unique random lasing mode. It is also mentioned that the Q-factor may not be well defined for complex oscillators and a more detailed model may be needed to explain it. Additionally, a paper is referenced where the Q-factor is calculated for isolated peaks in a random laser.
  • #1
samchan
3
0
Many papers about random lasers mention the Q-factor of random lasers. Since a random laser has multiple peaks close to each other like shown in the figure. Does each of these peaks correspond to a unique random lasing mode, or is it just a single mode?
244799


Similarly what is the right way to calculate the Q-factor of this random laser (example plot shown below) : Should it be wavelength at Peak1 divided by FWHM at (blue line) or wavelength of Peak1 divided by FWHM at (red line) ?

244800


Should the Q-factor be calculated at -3db or FWHM?
 
Science news on Phys.org
  • #2
IMO, Q is only well defined for simple oscillators. I'm not sure that there is a way to describe two response peaks with one value. You will probably have to explain to people what is going on with more words or a more detailed model. Perhaps as the sum of two peaks each with their own λ and Q?
 
  • Like
Likes samchan
  • #3
DaveE said:
IMO, Q is only well defined for simple oscillators. I'm not sure that there is a way to describe two response peaks with one value. You will probably have to explain to people what is going on with more words or a more detailed model. Perhaps as the sum of two peaks each with their own λ and Q?

I saw another paper, where they calculate Q-factor for isolated peaks in a random laser. Below is a picture from a paper titled : Random Lasing with a High Quality Factor over the Whole Visible Range Based on Cascade Energy Transfer. They measure bandwidth of 0.05nm at FWHM.
244836
 

Similar threads

Back
Top