Modified Mach-Zehnder Interferometer

  • Thread starter Thread starter birulami
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interferometer
birulami
Messages
153
Reaction score
0
The Mach-Zehnder interferometer is shown in wikipedia and on David Harrison's page.

If the second (upper right) half silvered mirror is taken away and no sample (as in the wikipedia setup) is in any of the two paths, I read that when sending individual photons through the device, roughly 50% of them end up in each detector.

What I would like to know is the following:
  1. Does anyone know a paper where real counts are reported, e.g. like: "we send 100 individual photons, 49 ended up in 1 and 47 ended up in 2, 4 where lost"?
  2. If I further remove one of the detectors, what percentage of photons is registered in the remaining detector? (published counts available?)

Thanks,
Harald.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. Removing the second beamsplitter eliminates the interference and just let's the two beams from the first beamsplitter go directly to the detectors. The photon counting you are asking for is done when the efficiency of the first beamsplitter is measured (ignoring the reflectivity of the two mirrors). That is often reported in papers describing interferomters.

2. If 50% goes to each detector, then 50% will still go to the remaining detector. Removing one detector has no effect on what's measured at the other detector.
 
Young's work may be a good starting point.
Mach E., The principles of physics optics
New York - Dover, 1953
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...

Similar threads

Back
Top