Modular arithmetic with a variable modulus and fractions

Floating Info
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
(This is my first post.)

I can't seem to find a good way of solving this sort of congruence for x:

x^2 / 3 + 11 \equiv 5 (mod x)

Through trial and error it appears at least 3 and 6 are answers, but how can you reach them regularly? (I'm heard conflicting things about fractions being defined for modular arithmetic. It might be that this isn't even a createable congruence.)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Floating Info said:
I'm heard conflicting things about fractions being defined for modular arithmetic.
If the denominator is prime to the base then it's always defined. Otherwise, only when the HCF of denominator and base happens to divide the numerator in the ordinary way:
1/3 (6) does not exist because there is no number x s.t. 3x\equiv1 (6).
6/15 (9) is ok because HCF(15,9) = 3, which cancels to produce 2/5 (9) = 4.
Floating Info said:
x^2 / 3 + 11 \equiv 5 (mod x)
Just multiply it out and see what you get.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top