What's the Best Module Selection for Pursuing Theoretical Physics After BSc?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Centaur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bsc module
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on selecting the best module choices for a BSc student aiming to pursue theoretical physics at the postgraduate level. The university offers a limited selection of modules, with the possibility of customizing choices pending Dean approval. The student expresses concern about being "forced" into a specific research area related to Materials Development, which may not align with their interest in theoretical physics. After researching, the student believes that a module selection emphasizing Physics, Mathematics, and Applied Mathematics, along with some Computer Science, would provide a strong foundation for their future studies. They are considering whether to request a customized module selection or to accept the default options, which include Chemistry instead of Computer Science. The student seeks advice on the best approach to take in this situation.
Centaur
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
So basically I want to go further into theoretical physics after my BSc. But I don't know what modules would be the best choice.

The University I applied for only offers the following module choice, but they state that if I want another selection, the Dean must approve it.

1st year:
Chemistry
Physics
Applied Mathematics
Mathematics
Computer Science (Only Computing Fundamentals)

2nd year a choice of 3 of the above subjects (with Computer Science excluded) and the 3rd year a choice of 2.

And ironically they call this choice structure, Materials Development, as their research at the postgraduate level focuses on Materials. What I am worrying about is that they are going to try and "force" me to do my post-grad with them in one of their research fields and not at another institution that offers Theoretical Physics.

I think the best would be one of the following:

1st year:
Physics
Mathematics
Applied Mathematics
Computer Science

2nd year:
Physics
Mathematics
Computer Science

3rd year:
Physics
Mathematics

OR

1st year:
Physics
Mathematics
Applied Mathematics
Computer Science

2nd year:
Physics
Mathematics
Applied Mathematics

3rd year:
Physics
Mathematics


Which selection do you think will be the best foundation for doing theoretical physics at the postgraduate level.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I did some more research and I now think the following selection of modules is the best choice:

1st year:
Physics
Mathematics
Applied Mathematics
Computer Science

2nd year:
Physics
Mathematics
Applied Mathematics

3rd year:
Physics
Mathematics

With that selection I get the most Mathematics in and a little bit Programming Fundamentals. However, I'm open for changes and advice.

Thanks
 
Any advice would be great. I don't know what to do in this scenario. Must I ask for the changes, and do my customized version or should I just go with the default one and do the Chemistry and not Computer Science.

Thanks
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Back
Top