Modulus for X Axis: Can You Stop Negative Values?

  • Thread starter Thread starter madmike159
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Axis Modulus
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the concept of using modulus functions to prevent negative values on the x-axis in mathematical graphs. While y = |x| remains positive, the question arises about whether a modulus can be applied to x to avoid negative values, particularly in contexts like radioactive decay where negative time is conceptually challenging. Participants clarify that negative time can be defined relative to a chosen starting point, allowing for calculations that yield meaningful results even before that point. The conversation also touches on the need for an "opposite" of the modulus function, although no clear solution is presented. Overall, the dialogue emphasizes the flexibility of time in mathematical applications and the challenges of representing certain phenomena graphically.
madmike159
Gold Member
Messages
369
Reaction score
0
y = |x| can't go below the y-axis because a Modulus is always positive, but can you get a modulus that stops x going negitive? Could this be used for things like radioactive decay where the graph should go in -x but doesn't because you can't have - time?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
x, as a function of y, x= |y| does that. I am not clear why you say "you can't have negative time". There is no such thing as an "absolute" time. In any application of mathematics, to, say, physics, you are free to choose which moment you will call "t= 0". Negative values of t simply mean times before your chosen starting point.

For example, if I have a radioactive substance, with half-life \lambda, that, at time 0 (say, when I start the experiment) has mass m= A grams, then as time t, it will have mass m= A(1/2)^{\lambda t}. Taking t< 0 will give a mass greater than A, which is a perfectly reasonable answer: before time t= 0, it had greater mass than at time t= 0.
 
"Taking t< 0 will give a mass greater than A, which is a perfectly reasonable answer: before time t= 0, it had greater mass than at time t= 0."

Unless it was created at some time as a by-product of a nuclear reaction.
 
Really all I wanted to know is if there is an opposite of the modulus function.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top