Modulus Predictions for Binomial Expansion Coefficients?

  • Thread starter Thread starter coolul007
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Binomial Expansion
coolul007
Gold Member
Messages
271
Reaction score
8
I am trying to predict the modulus without really doing the expansion. Therefore I'm in a snag with actually computing vs. only computing what I think I need. Here's the assumption I am Making:

n C r == 0 mod (n-1) for all r > 1

n C r are the coefficients of the binomial expansion. My assumption is that all the middle terms are zero and that only the:

x^n + nx^(n-1) + 0 +... +0 + nx +1 need to be computed mod(n-1)

My theoretical results are conflicting with the actual.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The middle terms are 0 mod(n-1) if and only if n-1 is prime.
 
robert2734 said:
The middle terms are 0 mod(n-1) if and only if n-1 is prime.

Is this still a true statement for n-1 not prime? I am having trouble as the expansion of n! == 0 mod(n-1), can you explain? Thanx

n C r == 0 mod (n-1) for all r > 1
 
say n-1=6 then the expansion is x^7+7x^6+21x^5+35x^4+35x^3+21x^2+7x+1. The middle terms are not multiples of 6.

if n-1=5 x^6+5x^5+15x^4+20x^3+15x^2+5x+1, the middle terms are multiples of 5 because 5 is prime.
 
I kind of figured out the why. When n-1 is prime there exists only one number to divide into. When n-1 is composite there exist the prime factors of n-1 plus there multiples to divide the n-1 composite in the "numerator" thus leaving no value for n-1 to divide into. It then becomes coprime to the rest of the coefficient. Well, back to the drawing board.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top