Molar extinction coefficent calculation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the molar extinction coefficient for Bovine serum albumin (BSA), specifically noting that the standard formula used is based on absorbance at 280 nm. The participant expresses confusion about applying this formula for a lab testing absorbance at 595 nm, typically used in a Bradford assay. It is clarified that the extinction coefficient for BSA is around 44,000 M^-1 cm^-1, and the initial calculation of 52,040 M^-1 cm^-1 may be inaccurate due to the inclusion of a signal peptide in the amino acid sequence provided. The Bradford assay requires a standard curve for accurate protein concentration measurement, as it cannot derive extinction coefficients from the primary sequence. The participant plans to reference literature for correct calculations while considering the provided peptide sequence.
vande060
Messages
180
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I am to calculate the molar extinction coefficient for Bovine serum albumin

Homework Equations



ε = (nW×5500) + (nY×1490) + (nC×125) for coefficients around 280nm

The Attempt at a Solution



I know how to solve this by adding up the tryptophan, tyrosine, and cytosine for the peptide sequence of BSA, but for the lab I am running we are testing absorbance at 595 nm, not 280nm. Also I know that the Practical Handbook of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology cites most extinction coefficients at 280. Can I still use my calculation for the formula that is supposed to be at 280nm.

When I do the math I get: (3*5500) + (21*1490) + ( 34*125) = 52040 M ^-1 cm^ -1

this seems too high though, as most sources I'm finding say the extinction coefficent should be around 44,000.

I used an amino acid sequence my prof gave me.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps your professor forgot that the first 25 amino acids of BSA are a signal peptide that gets cleaved off and is not present in the mature BSA protein (which has an extinction coeff ~44,000).

Absorption at 595nm is used to measure protein concentration in a Bradford assay, where protein binding to a coomassie blue dye creates a color change that allows you to measure the protein concentration. Unlike measuring the absorbance at 280nm, you cannot calculate an extinction coefficient for the Bradford assay from the primary sequence of the protein. In order to convert an absorbance measurement at 595nm to a protein concentration in the Bradford assay, you need to make a standard curve with solutions of known concentration.
 
WE are doing it by making a standard curve, I think this was more of an exercise. I'll try to find good literature to cite the correct calculation of the EC by, otherwise I'm going with using the peptide sequence he gave us. Thanks so much for clearing that up
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top