Chemistry Mole concept- to find isotopic formula

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the isotopic formula of a diatomic element X2, given that it contains 34 moles of electrons and 40 moles of neutrons. It is concluded that each atom of X2 has 17 electrons and 20 neutrons, leading to an atomic mass of 37. The isotopic notation suggested is 17X37, indicating both the atomic number and mass. Participants emphasize the need to clarify the atomic mass and number based on the provided moles of subatomic particles. The conversation revolves around understanding the relationship between moles, atomic structure, and isotopic representation.
xiphoid
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
1mole of diatomic element X2 contains 34 and 40 moles of electrons and neutrons respectively, the isoptopic formula of the element is?

Homework Statement


1mole of diatomic element X2 contains 34 and 40 moles of electrons and neutrons respectively

Homework Equations


all the basic ones!

The Attempt at a Solution


The answer from my point of view should be 17X37
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Looks good.
 


I am assuming that the isotopic formula of the element asks you for that notation where you display both the atomic mass (protons + neutrons) and atomic number (protons).

Something like 1H1

Then, let's start from the beginning.

34 moles of electrons in X2 = 17 electrons in one atom.
Similarly, 20 neutrons in one atom.

-------------------

With this in mind, what will be the atomic mass? What will be the atomic number?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Back
Top