Moment of Inertia: 3 Point Mass, Massless Rods, Rotational Motion

AI Thread Summary
The moment of inertia calculation for the system of three point masses, each 110 kg and connected by massless rods, is correctly computed as 5019.3 kg m². The center of mass being at the rotation point simplifies the calculation since the distribution of mass does not affect the moment of inertia for point masses. If the masses were distributed differently, such as in the form of disks or spheres, the parallel axis theorem would need to be applied. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding mass distribution when calculating moment of inertia. Overall, the initial calculation is valid for the given configuration.
Celestiela
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Simple question:

I have 3 point masses of 110 kg apiece. All are connected by 3 massless rods to a massless point in the middle. The system will rotate about that point in the middle. The rods are 3.9 m long. They are 120 degrees apart from each other like:

.|
/ \

Kinda. Anyways, when I'm calculating the moment of interia, am I correct in saying saying (110 kg)(3.9 m)(3.9 m)+(110 kg)(3.9 m)(3.9 m)+(110 kg)(3.9 m)(3.9 m)=5019.3 kg m^2? Do I need to worry about the way the weight is distributed? Or is everything ok because the center of mass is at that point? What if it wasn't? I think I'm confusing the two...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Celestiela said:
Simple question:

I have 3 point masses of 110 kg apiece. All are connected by 3 massless rods to a massless point in the middle. The system will rotate about that point in the middle. The rods are 3.9 m long. They are 120 degrees apart from each other like:

.|
/ \

Kinda. Anyways, when I'm calculating the moment of interia, am I correct in saying saying (110 kg)(3.9 m)(3.9 m)+(110 kg)(3.9 m)(3.9 m)+(110 kg)(3.9 m)(3.9 m)=5019.3 kg m^2? Do I need to worry about the way the weight is distributed? Or is everything ok because the center of mass is at that point? What if it wasn't? I think I'm confusing the two...

Your calculation is correct for point masses, which is what you were given. If each of those masses were distributed in some way (like disks or spheres) a correct calculation would involve the parallel axis theorem. Each term in your sum would then have an additional term that depended on the shape of the mass.
 
sweet! Thanks! :biggrin:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top