Moment of inertia about different axes

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on identifying bodies with the same moment of inertia about various axes. Participants agree that no body has a uniform moment of inertia for all axes, while a solid sphere is cited as having the same moment of inertia for all axes passing through its center. A hemisphere is also mentioned, with clarification that its moment of inertia remains consistent along axes through its center and perpendicular to its plane surface. The square sheet is noted for having the same moment of inertia about any axis in its plane through its center, supported by the perpendicular axis theorem. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding mass distribution and symmetry in calculating moments of inertia.
spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31
I found this problem in a book and am trying to answer it by myself.

1. Can you think of a body that has the same moment of inertia for all possible axes? If so, give an example, and if not, explain why this is not possible.

Solution: I can't think of any example or disprove the hypothesis. So I am wondering how I can answer this part.


2. Can you think of a body that has the same moment of inertia for all axes passing through a certain point? If so, give an example and indicate where the point is located.

Solution: An example is a solid sphere, with the point located at its centre. What do you think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. I can't think of anybody having same moment inertia about any axis.
2. a). Sphere
b).Hemisphere also has same m.o.i about any axis passing through the centre of its plane surface.
C). Square sheet.
About any axis in its plane and through its centre.
 
1. reason why there's none: hint - moment of inertia depends on the distribution of mass about the axis.

2. sphere is useful - the important part is your reasoning.
[I would not have guessed the hemisphere one - any axis through the center of it's plane surface? Really? because I'd have thought an axis perpendicular to the surface would be different from an axis along it. Square sheet has an extra constraint besides "any axis through a point" though doesn't it?]
 
yes, m.o.i. Of hemisphere will be same along axis through the centre and the one perpendicular to it. If you want to find the m.o.i about the axis along the surface through its centre then you have to either see the symmetry or use the long integration method.
I have via done integration also and result comes out to be same.
For the square sheet, you can prove by perpendicular axis theoram.
(Not able to upload picture from mobile help)
 
Hmmm? I'm not doubting you - it's just not something I'd have guessed. Clearly I am now going to have to work it out since I also have not seen it in standard tables of moments of inertia. Well, it'll brush up my calculus and it doesn't look hard.

Time to hear from OP methinks.
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Moment of Inertia about an axis and Torque about a point
Replies
5
Views
3K
I Inertia of body moving about two distinct parallel axes
Replies
10
Views
2K
I Moment of inertia of human body with limbs at an angle
Replies
12
Views
2K
How can I calculate the moment of inertia of any object?
Replies
10
Views
2K
Why Do Different Objects Share Similar Moments of Inertia?
Replies
1
Views
1K
Moment of inertia where mass and torque are at a different positions
2
Replies
69
Views
5K
Determine Mass moment of inertia about any axis given Ixx...
Replies
4
Views
2K
Addition of moments of inertia
Replies
35
Views
6K
Torque and Moment of Inertia of a Lever Arm
Replies
2
Views
3K
About torque and moment of inertia
Replies
30
Views
7K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top