Moment of Inertia: Ignoring Small Bond Axis Molecule

Click For Summary
The moment of inertia of a molecule about its bond axis is generally small enough to ignore due to the significant difference in scale between bond lengths and nuclear dimensions. Calculations show that the moment of inertia about the bond axis is on the order of 10^-10 compared to moments of inertia about axes perpendicular to the bond axis. The bond length, which is the distance between atomic nuclei, typically ranges from 1 x 10^-10 to 2 x 10^-10 meters, while nuclear diameters are on the order of 10^-30 meters. This disparity in dimensions results in a negligible contribution to the overall moment of inertia when considering rotation about the bond axis. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately calculating molecular dynamics and rotational behavior.
  • #31
Yes. This is the point of asking you what nuclear dimensions are; so, calculating moments of inertia for the three rotational axes of a molecule about its center of mass, you have two that square something of the same order of magnitude as the bond length (not half in general, because not all diatomic molecules are homonuclear), and a third moment that squares a distance the order of nuclear dimensions.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Bystander said:
This is the point of asking you what nuclear dimensions are; so, calculating moments of inertia for the three rotational axes of a molecule about its center of mass, you have two that square something of the same order of magnitude as the bond length (not half in general, because not all diatomic molecules are homonuclear), and a third moment that squares a distance the order of nuclear dimensions.
Sorry but i am not getting this post.
 
  • #33
Three questions: what size are bond lengths? What is typical nuclear diameter (radius)? What is the ratio of the squares of those two dimensions?
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
  • #34
bond length is the average distance between nuclei of two bonded atoms in a molecule. why are you asking for bond lengths?as there is only one ,right?[/QUOTE]
and why you have written radius inside the bracket after word diameter as these two are totally different.
 
  • #35
You've got finals or midterms coming up, so I'll give you a break --- squaring bond lengths gives you something of the order of 10-20m2 and squaring nuclear diameter or radius gives you something of the order of 10-30m2. Multiplying those values time nuclear masses gives you moments of inertia. The moment of inertia about a bond axis is on the order of 10-10 that of the moments of inertia for rotations about axes perpendicular to the bond axis.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
  • #36
Bystander said:
You've got finals or midterms coming up, so I'll give you a break --- squaring bond lengths gives you something of the order of 10-20m2 and squaring nuclear diameter or radius gives you something of the order of 10-30m2. Multiplying those values time nuclear masses gives you moments of inertia. The moment of inertia about a bond axis is on the order of 10-10 that of the moments of inertia for rotations about axes perpendicular to the bond axis.
Please can you explain how you calculate moment of inertia.I am having very hard time understanding it .what exactly is bond length (bond axis)here (in the image given below)am i correct?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2014-12-10_22-29-18.png
    upload_2014-12-10_22-29-18.png
    54.1 KB · Views: 462
  • #37
Bystander said:
nuclear diameter or radius
how these two are same?
 
  • #38
gracy said:
Please can you explain how you calculate moment of inertia.
gracy said:
I normally calculate moment of inertia as total mass multiplied by distance square.
You've already said how to calculate the moment of inertia.

gracy said:
how these two are same?
They are the same order of magnitude. One is half the other, diameter is twice the radius.
Bond length is the internuclear distance.
 
  • #39
Bystander said:
You've already said how to calculate the moment of inertia.I normally calculate moment of inertia as total mass multiplied by distance square.
I am not sure which distance square?
 
  • #40
The distance from the axis of rotation to the increment of mass.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
  • #41
gracy said:
I am not sure which distance square?

Its the distance perpendicular from whatever axis you are taking it from. You can have moments of Inertia about the y-axis and about the x axis.

Iyy = summation of mi*xi² (its in x direction because x is perpendicular to the y axis).
Ixx = summation of mi*yi² (its in y direction because y is perpendicular to the x axis).

Of course, you could have moment of inertia about any axis and that is where things become more complicated mathematically.
 
  • #42
please have a look at this video from time 3:15 to 3:30.Why he took moment of inertia about x-axis nearly zero?
 
  • #43
Bystander said:
squaring bond lengths gives you something of the order of 10-20m2
How you calculate bond lengths without any information given?
 
  • #44
Bond lengths between atoms are in the neighborhood of 10-10 m. For a specific compound you can measure bond length using X-ray diffraction, or calculate a bond length from spectroscopic data. All bond lengths fall into a range from ~1 x 10-10 to 2 x 10-10m.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
  • #45
according to you Moment of inertia=total nuclear mass multiplied by The distance from the axis of rotation to the increment of mass.And according to your post no 35 you have calculated Moment of inertia=square of bond lengths i.e something of the order of 10-20m2 multiplied by square of nuclear diameter or radius i .e something of the order of 10-30m2. Multiplying those values time nuclear masses .
so you mean he distance from the axis of rotation to the increment of mass=square of bond lengths multiplied by square of nuclear diameter or radius .
right?
 
  • #46
No. No. No.
I will give you a toothpick. You will stick one baby green pea on one end and a second baby green pea on the other end. The bond length is the length of the toothpick, or the distance between the peas. The peas are the two atomic nuclei in the diatomic molecule. Lay it on the table in front of you. You can spin it on the table (horizontal plane) around the center of the toothpick (the point midway between the peas), or you can roll it as if the toothpick were an axle and the peas were little bitty tires, or you can rotate it in a vertical plane about the center of the toothpick. These are the three axes of rotation. The moments of inertia for rotation in either the horizontal or vertical planes are calculated by squaring the distances of the peas from the center of the toothpick, multiplying the squares by the masses of the peas and adding them. The moment of inertia for rolling the toothpick is calculated by finding how far the peas are from the axis of the toothpick, and that is at most only half the diameter of the peas (the toothpick is stuck through them), squaring that distance and multiplying by the masses of the peas.

You do NOT square one distance for one moment and multiply it by the square of another distance for a different moment.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
  • #47
Bystander said:
the axis of the toothpick,
what you mean by the axis of the toothpick?You have been very patient till now clearing all my silly doubts,thanks for it and i am just about to get it.
 
  • #48
Is a toothpick approximately a line segment? Think of the long dimension.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
  • #49
Bystander said:
Is a toothpick approximately a line segment? Think of the long dimension.
upload_2014-12-11_0-20-39.png

Now,please tell me what you mean by axis of toothpick?
 
  • #50
Draw a line from the point at one end through the toothpick to the point at the other; strictly speaking that is the "major" axis.
 
  • #51
Bystander said:
Draw a line from the point at one end through the toothpick to the point at the other; strictly speaking that is the "major" axis.
Am i right?
upload_2014-12-11_0-33-18.png
 
  • #52
Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Think also of the axes of the cartesian coordinate system, imaginary lines intersecting at right angles to one another.
 
  • #53
Bystander said:
No. No. No.
I will give you a toothpick. You will stick one baby green pea on one end and a second baby green pea on the other end. The bond length is the length of the toothpick, or the distance between the peas. The peas are the two atomic nuclei in the diatomic molecule. Lay it on the table in front of you. You can spin it on the table (horizontal plane) around the center of the toothpick (the point midway between the peas), or you can roll it as if the toothpick were an axle and the peas were little bitty tires, or you can rotate it in a vertical plane about the center of the toothpick. These are the three axes of rotation. The moments of inertia for rotation in either the horizontal or vertical planes are calculated by squaring the distances of the peas from the center of the toothpick, multiplying the squares by the masses of the peas and adding them. The moment of inertia for rolling the toothpick is calculated by finding how far the peas are from the axis of the toothpick, and that is at most only half the diameter of the peas (the toothpick is stuck through them), squaring that distance and multiplying by the masses of the peas.

You do NOT square one distance for one moment and multiply it by the square of another distance for a different moment.
The rolling of toothpick is similar to my the moment of inertia of a molecule about the bond axis and because we are multiplying square of half of diameter (in the order of 10-30m2)with masses of pea.so it's value reaches nearly zero.
 
  • #54
gracy said:
The rolling of toothpick is similar to my the moment of inertia of a molecule about the bond axis and because we are multiplying square of half of diameter (in the order of 10-30m2)with masses of pea.so it's value reaches nearly zero.right.?That's what my original question was.
 
  • #55
Yes.
 
  • #56
Bystander said:
Yes.
Ok last question
Bystander said:
Lay it on the table in front of you. You can spin it on the table (horizontal plane) around the center of the toothpick (the point midway between the peas)
This is same as motion in xz plane i.e perpendicular or about to y axis.
Bystander said:
or you can rotate it in a vertical plane about the center of the toothpick.
This is same as motion in xy plane i.e perpendicular to or about z axis.
Right?
 
  • #57
You got it.
 
  • #58
Bystander said:
You got it.
Ok.Now it's finally my last question.Just a tiny doubt.What about rolling case?isn't it same as motion in yz plane i.e about or perpendicular to x axis. .According to your 17 post i don't think so.how x.axis differ from bond axis?just that bond axis passes from center of mass and x-axis doesn't?If we take toothpick example ,how would motion in yz plane look like?
 
  • #59
gracy said:
Ok.Now it's finally my last question.Just a tiny doubt.What about rolling case?isn't it same as motion in yz plane i.e about or perpendicular to x axis. .According to your 17 post i don't think so.how x.axis differ from bond axis?just that bond axis passes from center of mass and x-axis doesn't?If we take toothpick example ,how would motion in yz plane look like?
Wait.I think i have figured it out.motion in YZ plane would be same as in
Bystander said:
Lay it on the table in front of you. You can spin it on the table (horizontal plane) around the center of the toothpick (the point midway between the peas),
Just instead of horizontal plane it would be vertical plane.Right?
 
  • #60
Yup.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K