Moment of Inertia of Rod w/ Masses M, m1, & m2

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the moment of inertia of a rod with additional masses placed at specified distances from the axis of rotation. The axis is located at the center of the rod, which is assumed to be of uniform density. Participants clarify that the parallel axis theorem is not necessary for this problem, as the moments of inertia can be summed directly. The formula I = Icm + m1r1^2 + m2r2^2 is confirmed as the correct approach, with emphasis on expressing r1 and r2 in terms of the rod's length L. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between the masses and their distances from the axis of rotation to solve the problem effectively.
roman15
Messages
68
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the moment of inertia of a rod with mass M, that has a mass m1, L/2 to the left of the axis of rotation and a mass m2, L/4 to the right of the axis of rotation. L is the length of the entire rod?

Not sure what to do. My professor said that I had to use the parallel axis theorem, but I am having trouble appling it to this problem, any help would be great!


Homework Equations



I = Icm + mr^2

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're not providing enough information, like where the axis of rotation is relative to the center of mass of the rod and how the rod is oriented.
 
Oh sorry about that. Well the rod is horizontal and I wasn't given the centre of mass. But the axis of rotation is at the middle of the rod.
 
If the rod is of uniform density, its center of mass will be in the middle, and the axis of rotation passes through this point.

From how you've described the problem, you don't need to use the parallel-axis theorem. You just need to sum the moments of inertia of the rod and the two masses.
 
oh ok so then the moment of inertia would just be

I = Icm +m1r1^2 +m2r2^2
 
Yup, you just need to find Icm in terms of the mass and length of the rod and express r1 and r2 in terms of L.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top