Momentum and energy of rebounding balls

AI Thread Summary
When a tennis ball bounces off a wall, it reverses its momentum from p to -p, resulting in a change of momentum of 2p. Despite this change, the kinetic energy of the ball remains constant in a perfectly elastic collision because its speed does not change, only its direction does. The wall experiences an impulse equal to the change in momentum of the ball, which is double the ball's initial momentum. In a closed system, total momentum is conserved, meaning the wall and Earth gain an equal amount of momentum, but their massive size results in an imperceptible change in velocity. This explanation clarifies the relationship between momentum and kinetic energy during the rebound.
d-richard
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Greetings,
I was thinking about bouncing a tennis ball against a wall and how its momentum and kinetic energy would change. I asked a friend of mine and he answered that the ball would transfer more forward momentum than it had to the wall but its kinetic energy would remain constant. How is that possible? I know that the ball will strike the wall with momentum p and and bounce back with a momentum -p ignoring any forces (including gravity) that affect my ball-wall system. The energy should be conserved as the wall is assumed to be frictionless. How is it then, that the ball rebounds off the wall by transferring more momentum than it had? I assumed that this is a closed system, so therefore this should be an elastic collision. Am I wrong in doing so? And if so, how does the momentum actually reverse direction? Thanks for any answers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The ball strikes the wall with forward momentum p_forward = mv.

Assuming a perfect ball, it bounces backward with momentum p_backward = -mv.

The change in momentum is (p_forward - p_backward) = (mv) - (-mv) = 2*mv.

Hence the impulse felt by the wall is double the momentum of the ball. But if the bounce is perfect, the speed is unchanged - thus the kinetic energy of the ball is unchanged: only the direction changes.

For imperfect balls, walls, and bounces you get something less for both.

PS: the ball reverses direction because it is _elastic_.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thanks a lot. Makes a lot more sense
 
Also, total momentum of the Earth and ball and wall is conserved. The ball has gained -2P momentum, and the Earth and wall will gain 2P momentum (since the wall is firmly stuck in the earth). say the mass of Earth and wall is ##M_E + M_W## this will be of the order of 10^24 kg, and the momentum 2P will be of the order of 10 kg m/s So the velocity of the Earth and wall, which results from the transfer of momentum will be of the order of 10^(-24) m/s In other words, you just wouldn't notice it.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I see. Very useful. Thanks
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top